Category: Uncategorized

Jenny Collins.

This is what gives me pause about the lion’s share of Big Medical.

Medically-incestuous research, I like to call it.

For the anti-vaxxers, quit with the dumb memes and toe-deep logic.

Collins writes with some neck-deep gravitas here. Please slow your roll and develop your logic and argumentation such that it matches your passion.

For those in the traditional medical community who see one way of doing things and acting as though any branch of science is settled, you might want to reconsider.

Behaving as though “settled science” exists, and behaving as if we should be controlled by governments into putting stuff into us is NOT the way we go about making America the way she was designed: liberated.

Further, “settled science” is a good way to provoke the L-rd to send Feynman, Rutherford, and Einstien.

“Settled science” is the purview of the Pharisees, and when G-d does a new thing, those who have settled their neat little paradigms will be in for a rude awakening.

#rejectamedicalreligiousspirit

With those elements out of the way, the following is what it will take for us to consider even looking at supporting the option of vaccines. But be warned, mandating vaccines is one way to start a revolt.

Oh and I don’t recall which thread it was in now, but to clarify what I meant about anti-science: Any person, news outlet or doctor who says vaccines are completely safe are anti-science in my view because it is not good science to deem something safe that has ever been studied long-term for safety or for their synergistic effects.

There may be a few studies suggesting single shot efficacy, I’ll give you that, but most were paid for by the industry, so those unfortunately discredit themselves due to the conflicts of interest.

As a preamble, it’s wise to remember that efficacy and safety are not the same thing.

For example, nuclear bombs may be effective in eradicating some terrorist cells. But nuclear bombs are not safe. Too many casualties of war and life-long impairments, including death of those who were never a threat to begin with.

There are so many safer, more humane ways to strengthen the immune system without vaccines. (But they don’t get airtime by Pharma since their business model only makes money from disease or disease management, not from healthy people.)

Anyways, back to your question, here are a few answers for starters (I came up with most of these myself and asked a few friends who have studied more than I have what they would add and included their answers too)—because we don’t even know what we don’t know yet.

Findings from any of the following would naturally lead to more inquiries.

First, before anything else, remove the legal immunity from the vaccine manufacturers—so the pharmaceutical companies are once again subject to liability for injuries and deaths. There is no incentive for Pharma to make them safer since there is no liability. Your and my tax dollars should not pay for negligence by corporations. (No liability, no deal.)

* Several independent meta analyses (gold standard reviews) by independent scientists, researchers and doctors from diverse training (allopathic, naturopathic and more) who are not funded in any form by pharmaceutical interests. (Medical pluralism is a strength, not a weakness.)

* Vaccine inserts say it has not been studied for carcinogenic or mutagenic properties or ability to impair fertility (so that’s a good place to look.)

* Independent studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. (Hasn’t been done.)

* Several generational studies examining the lifetime health and generational health of those who have been vaccinated and those who have not been vaccinated. (Hasn’t ever been done.)

* Independent studies investigating the multiple interacting factors, both short- and long-term synergistic effects of the current vaccine schedule in large samples. (Also never been done.)

* Research exploring the effects of bioaccumulation over time and its impact on neurological functions.

* This is a big one: Genetic research studying susceptibility to vaccine injuries so we have better data to “do no harm.” (MTHFR gene mutation for example are highly susceptible to adverse effects.)

* Go beyond the surface for autism and vaccine links and look into the genetics specifically of different populations. Especially when studies already show that African American children and the Somali populations in the U.S. and abroad have higher rates of autism. The CDC already does their Community Report on autism every 4 years or so, but they need to continue to do research on why it is, not only reporting what is.

* Environmental studies — how do different environments shape susceptibility to adverse effects.

* Research showing no correlation to autoimmune diseases. (There are SO many linked possible side effects that need to be explored with intensity.)

* Safe adjuvants (for all vaccines) and safe cell substrates (for live virus vaccines). Both of which would need to undergo individual testing using the gold standard double blind randomized saline placebo. And the testing would need to be carried on long term at least 10-15 years before marketing the vaccine so any late effects (especially cancer, diabetes and other autoimmune illnesses ) could be studied.

* Testing every vaccine for safe amounts of adjuvant for different patient weights, (applying the same standards other drugs are subject to.)

* Studies that show repeatedly that an IgG inoculation (blood born) increases an IgA (gut born immunity) response safely. (Because science can rarely prove…the results or findings merely suggest.)

I look forward to your reply. No rush.

This. This is a proper anti-vax response. And “Amen”!

Anne Hamilton has a penned a profuse number exceptionally well-thought-out posts on Facebook.

This post responds well to the concept of the Lenten season.

She writes:

Back about forty years ago, someone told me that if I wanted to give up sugar in coffee, I would have to do it forty times before I broke the habit. That turned out to be true. I suffered all the way through 39 cups of unsweetened coffee—only to discover that, on the 40th cup, my desire for sugar had gone.

A couple of years later, I applied the same principle to milk and gave it up too.

Forty, of course, is a number found repeatedly in Scripture. Perhaps most famously in the number of years the Israelties spent in the desert and the number of days that Jesus spent fasting in the wilderness.

So let me offer a challenge that only Jesus can help you fulfil. Instead of deciding what you’ll “give up” for Lent, ask God to put His finger on a “false refuge” that He’d like you to give up permanently. Ask Him to identify a place of consolation, a subtle stronghold empowered by an idol, and – over the next forty days – ask Him to help you lay siege to it and bring it down.

It might not take that long. But if it does, ask Him for the strength of endurance that Jesus showed in the face of repeated temptation.

Just wow. I add a hearty amen. During this season, consider listening to what Father tells you to PERMANENTLY remove from your life.

And it may be coffee. Or covfefe.

Giggle.

So, I was listening to Arthur Burk’s Redemptive Gifts of Individuals, and heard the following, using the Romans 1 “spiral of sin” as a background.

I’m not sure I fully understand what goes on in the mind and the heart and the soul of the teacher: why it is so difficult for them to embrace the truth of who G-d says they are and step into leadership. But I do know that for those that have grown, for those that have changed…the beginning place has always been to engage their emotions in the celebration of who G-d is and what He has done.

I refer to this very simply as the upward and downward spiral that creates brain rot or cures brain rot in an individual. This applies to everybody but it is central to any Teacher who has grown up in a system that has a professional relationship with G-d, not a personal relationship with G-d.

Arthur Burk, The Redemptive Gifts of Individuals, Disc 4: Teacher, Cut 7: Letter To Pergamum, Timestamp: 10:59-11:44

The concept of the Brain versus the Heart is often times preached, and that poorly in the Evangelical Church on the whole. Yesterday, we were taught that the primacy of our identity and relationship with G-d begins in the heart and not the brain. There have been reams written that say we need to have a heart transformation and not just an increase of knowledge or a knowledge download.

Then there is Heidi Baker’s “Too Big <points to head>, Too Small <points to heart>” statement.

I have always had a profound issue with the concept of being forced to choose one or the other.

But in this case, I heard Arthur, in the context of the above, state the following that helps brain and heart fit together.

And once we have allowed a little bit of brain rot in to where we are not thinking as rationally as we used to, the next sin, the sin that we wouldn’t’ve committed yesterday becomes a little more plausible, and we can reason our way to the next sin, which causes more brain rot.

Arthur Burk, The Redemptive Gifts of Individuals, Disc 4: Teacher, Cut 7: Letter To Pergamum, Timestamp: 12:46-12:53

So, where did the downward spiral into this Brain Rot cycle begin? Romans 1 details a destruction of the MIND AND THOUGHT, not the heart. It is the destruction of the rational mind that leads to a rotting relationship with G-d.

So, where does the heart fit in, and how do we recover the brain/mind?

The first step, where we put one foot into the doorway to the downward spiral and a heart that is calloused to shame.

Verse 21.

” For although they knew G-d, they did not honor him as G-d or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.”

Arthur relayed the start of the spiral back to this verse, and this verse pairs the heart and the though/brain together. A fractal of two and a picture of fullness.

The baseline between brain rot and wholeness is being able to recognize G-d’s fingerprints in your life and being able to celebrate them. And when the Teacher becomes purely cerebral and has no EMOTIONAL ENGAGEMENT WITH G-D, he already has one foot in the downward spiral.

Arthur Burk, The Redemptive Gifts of Individuals, Disc 4: Teacher, Cut 7: Letter To Pergamum, Timestamp: 14:06-14:27

Let me assimilate the above into the following line.

The emotional component of the heart protects and defends the brain from destruction by the kingdom of darkness. Our emotional capacity to see G-d’s fingerprints and celebrate those fingerprints is like a Vitamin booster, a clove of garlic, and echinacea for the brain and thoughts.

Our inability or refusal to see, recognize, and emotionally engage, especially the Teacher, is what leads to the destruction of the brain, mind, the rational processes and thoughts.

They are designed to work in tandem.

It is not one over the other, anymore than it is a gift over all others, or a person over all others. It is a pairing for the turbocharging of fullness.

The purpose of a strong emotional component is a sharp mind, intellect, wisdom, knowledge, and understanding. All of our days, instead of picking one over the other, I say pick both.

Bless the heart and the emotions and protect the brain in order for the spirit to do its finest work.

Just some perspective here.

Thoughts? Feelings?

The good is the eternal enemy of the best.

Arthur Burk

I almost do not want to post this, but out of respect, affection, concern for truth, and a whole host of other reasons, I will.

I am going to say something that may shock some of y’all, but y’all need to hear it.

Coincidences do exist, and coincidences can happen.

Sometimes the L-rd allows coincidences to happen.

Sometimes He is behind those consequences.

And sometimes He is nowhere to be seen when events coincide.

And as much as we might want to parrot the idea that, “there are no coincidences in the kingdom of G-d” or “there is no word for ‘coincidence’ in Hebrew”, we need to be awakened to the idea that Father will allow coincidences to come into our lives just because He wants to see if we are paying attention.  Further, in us, He wants to expose times when we are lazily relying on circumstances to tell us what to do.  Dad did not design us to merely read whatever tea leaves may be in front of our faces at the time.

Coincidences do exist.  And I am sick of seeing people shipwreck because they used a series of unexplainable events as proof that Path X is the will of G-d.

Sloppy discernment merely assumes that G-d is speaking in everything that could be explained by coincidences, even a series of those.

The enemy can use familiar spirits to rig a series of events in order to get us to believe something, an event, or an end is the will of G-d.

What might actually be happening in a given situation or series of circumstances could be just a coincidence or coincidences.

Or it might be something worse.

I have kept my mouth closed on the subject of coincidences repeatedly.

And now, I need to speak more clearly.

If nothing than for the simple fact that I have, in the past, let others talk me into coincidences-as-really-the-voice-and-the-expressed-will-of-G-d.

Sometimes G-d will speak through something which could otherwise be seen as a coincidence.

And sometimes, we let our discernment get so sloppy that we let coincidences speak where they were not designed to speak.

Questions

My question for you is, “can you tell the difference?”

Do you know when a series of coincidences is just that?

Do you know when that thing that you are enamored with is not the making of G-d?

Are you actively increasing you discernment, or are you letting circumstances and coincidences, which do exist, carry you away.

Conclusion

Sometimes the bird, or the number, or the color, or the woman, or the man overhead is just that.

Sometimes, it is a thing of G-d.

Sometimes it is a thing of your own doing.

And sometimes it is a thing of the enemy.

We cannot afford sloppy discernment.

Sometimes a headache is just a headache.

Sometimes the number 22 is just the number 22.

Sometimes a bird in your yard is a bird in your yard.

And sometimes it isn’t, and there is a bigger picture going on.

Are you are you open to understanding the difference?

Do you know the difference?

And do you have the wisdom to actuate accordingly?

The following is in part a good help.

https://theslg.com/cd-albums/developing-discernment

Beyond this album, I would heartily recommend the following counsel.

Do not believe every spirit/circumstance/situation. Rather, out every spirit/situation/circumstance to the test. Feel it out before you swallow it, lest you swallow a camel.

We need more people to inspect fruit rather than just eating everything they are handed. And yes, we need more people who can flow in mishpat, execution, judgment, and justice.

We cannot afford more Needless Casualties of War, just because the stars aligned in a situation…

Or just because something is pleasing to behold; behaves like nourishing food, has vitamins, and minerals, and nutrients; is USDA-approved; and is desirable to make one wise.

Just because it is good does not mean it is G-d.

We are in this mess as humans precisely because the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge was GOOD FRUIT.  That fruit was “pleasing to the eye and good for food, and desireable to make one wise”.  But we need to know when the L-rd is telling us to stay away from something good because there is a higher purpose for Him in us.

The L-rd was willing to give people a temple back, but the temple was not the point.

The Tabernacle as an end in itself was never the point.

He is using the restoration of the temple (Ezekiel 40-42) to remind the Jewish people that He wanted to have a relationship with them.

The relationship was the point.

As the heart and soul of the canon is Deuteronomy 6:5 (love relationship with G-d), understand that He wanted to have a temple not for its own sake, but specifically so that it could be FILLED WITH HIS GLORY.

He still yearns to WALK IN, WITH, AND AMONG HIS PEOPLE. That is what the dative preposition ἐν ususally means.

He cried out in a loud voice on the last a greatest day of the feast (John 7:37-39, and then it says He was not yet glorified.

The purpose of communicating that point, is for us to realize the L-rd was designed to be glorified and walk among us as our Father and we as His children.

This communicates intimate relationship, which has always been the point. Connection is the priority over protocol. Not that protocol is not important, but protocol is a piece and like a bit of seasoning, whereas intimacy and relationship are the main dish.

Presented without comment. This is why I don’t support some football teams.

Not sure if this will turn into a multi-part series on some of the SOTM Dynamics, but I definitely got something this morning as I was breakfasting with my family. Often, as the expectation is that I will bring forth some portion of Scripture during breakfast, I will get something, five minutes into the text, and recently the lion’s share of the revelation has been coming from the Gospels.

This morning, the topic was prayer. I have been going through Matthew with the kids the last several mornings and going, more-or-less, verse-by-verse.

Today as I was with them, I was in the middle of lecturing (yes I do lecture my children) on prayer while frying eggs. And then I felt the Elbow of Heaven to hit that passage on which the L-rd talked with the crowds, on what some think was the Horns of Hattin, about prayer.

And so, at the first verse I read, went

“And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites -Matthew 6:5-

Plain as day. The Hypocrites. Now, in Yeshua’s day, “the hypocrites” could be deduced by the context. He is likely referring to the religious leaders.

But for our context, think of the religious leaders of our day who do not practice what they preach, and also think of the following euphemisms.

“But All Christians Are Hypocrites!,” “Not Perfect, Just Forgiven,” and [insert Your Favorite Triteism/Catchphrase]

We hear these sorts of things all the time. And they

Much of the currently prevailing belief about hypocrisy follows the lines of, “Everyone is a hypocrite”, or “only G-d is perfect” or something similar, “so why even bother at fighting hypocrisy?”

The truth is, Yeshua called the Pharisees and Saducees hypocrites, and thus, we are RESPONSIBLE to reject every hint of hypocrisy. Consistency of behavior is what gets people, who are considering the L-rd, to take Him more seriously.

Saying one thing and doing another is not typical Christ-following behavior. It’s sin.

As with all sin, turn tail from it and RUN. Don’t excuse it. Don’t qualify it. Don’t tolerate it. Cut it off.

No, not all Christ-followers are hypocrites. And the assertion of that statement does not make the statement “every Christian is perfect” true. Rather, followers of Yeshua are to SHUN hypocrisy. Period.

And the times of hypocrisy, as with other sin, as we grow in depth of relationship with him, should bear evidence of decreasing.

Hypocrisy In Prayer

Back to the text….

As I was speaking to my kids, I mentioned that we really were designed to not pray rote or pray the same thing every day, but rather, we were to pray consistently in alignment with the inner witness of the Spirit’s movement.

That is, instead of praying a “holy” checklist of acceptable prayers (bless my family, bless our nation, bless my pastor, touch this or that situation) out of hypocrisy…

When our relationship is designed to be living and breathing…

It was always Father’s intent that we find and cultivate the consistency of hearing Father’s heart in that connection time that we call “prayer” and go after the one thing that He is going after.

Instead of presenting a “Honey-Jesus-Do” list and looking impressive, we best work by hearing where He is in the moment of our connection time (John 5:19).

Instead of approaching the L-rd all the time as the transcendant G-d Who is Light Years and Realities Beyond and Outside of Us, we should cultivate the interaction that shows a revelation of His Fatherhood and Father’s heart.

For it is intimacy and authenticity, not unity and authority, that are the hallmarks of this season.

Instead of praying like devout believers, we were designed to pray like we were continuing a conversation with G-d our Father as Our Father.

Resisting hypocrisy in prayer, we find the conversation we were always meant to have.

Rejecting hypocrisy, we pursue authentic relationship.

Instead of praying to be seen by people, we were made to pray to be seen by the One who already sees us, El Roi.

If that authenticity is in praying for family, then pray for family.

But if it is hearing Him speak to a specific issue, then we ought to follow through against a specific issue.

Follow the consistency of your relationship with Him.

And resist hypocrisy.

Resist the trap of presenting yourself as having relationship with Him and behaving as if you don’t have relationship with Him.

One of the Problems With Our Political Climate: Our Collective Partial Blindness

Personally, I had some thoughts on President Trump’s State of the Union address.  I was under the impression, and have been under the impression that a Mesmerizing Spirit took over in Washington sometime during Bill Clinton’s administration, when we decided that the moral fiber of our elected officials was not a key issue.

And this mentality has continued till the present, when conservatives made the same shocking assertion, and we proclaimed that we were not electing a pastor, but a president.

So, this blind belief, the smokescreen of electability, and others, left us with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, with Trump winning the election.

Okay, let me draw it down to the issue.  The issue is not “can G-d use this man? (G-d can use whomever He darn well pleases.)”

The issue is, “Are we blind?”

Even partly blind is still not fully seeing.

If we can complain about a Democrat but not see a Republican, or a businessmen, with the same lens, then we are still partly blind.  If we refuse to collaborate and discuss with he other side, then we choose a position of blindness and mesmerism.

This goes for conservatives as well as liberals.

Furthermore, we blind ourselves with the brace of a lack of legitimacy, and a call for justice and rights at the expense of relationship.

G-d never made to to be creatures who have to choose between rights only or responsibility only always. There is a delicate balance and shift between the two postures relentlessly across the course of our lives.

It also shows we have determined to live as a partial and divided nation for the short game of overturning a Supreme Court case and not for the long game of winning the hearts of men.

The News of a Letter

I woke up to Sam Roberts asking me if I had seen Arthur’s most recent newsletter.

Mind you, we just gotten done having a discussion earlier this week about the political environs in both our nations the previous night.

And she told me to pick it up.

So I did.

I was floored. The man rarely speaks to political issues, and his eye for the detail and the well-reasoned read is phenomenal.

Arthur’s Thoughts: Spiritual Authority In America

I woke up on Wednesday morning, February 6^th, quite angry. 

I scanned the horizon for a cause. 

I had gone to bed well.  No ugly dreams.  Woke up after nine hours.  Not too shabby! 

Checked emails to see if one of my peeps was in trouble.  Didn’t see anything.

I gingerly made my way to work, keeping a tight cork on the volcano so no innocent people got buried in lava.

Finally, I realized thatFrom the bar to the boardroom, reconciliation and collaboration are not in vogue. 
The cultural climate today very much resembles the ramp-up to the Civil War. From the bar to the boardroom, reconciliation and collaboration are not in vogue. 
The cultural climate today very much resembles the ramp-up to the Civil War. From the bar to the boardroom, reconciliation and collaboration are not in vogue. 
The cultural climate today very much resembles the ramp-up to the Civil War.  I was feeling the nation.  The night before, the President gave his State of the Union Address and across the political spectrum, the responses were framed around hate with an intent to exacerbate the deep divisions we face.

From the bar to the boardroom, reconciliation and collaboration are not in vogue. 

The cultural climate today very much resembles the ramp-up to the Civil War. 

In 1844 James Polk was a dark horse candidate who won the election on a Democratic ticket, defeating Henry Clay the Whig.  Polk worked hard to establish legitimacy in office by changing tariffs, negotiating international treaties, reforming the banking industry and challenging Mexico.

President Polk wanted the southwest portion of the continent and Mexico showed no desire to cede it on any terms.  In spite of warnings from Mexico, Texas was annexed by the US in a fairly sloppy manner which led to an ambiguous border. 

Polk – and many Americans – desperately wanted war with Mexico for political and economic purposes.  He deliberately moved some American troops into the contested land along the border. 

On April 25, 1846, the Mexican cavalry bit on the bait and attacked the Americans, killing a dozen or so.

President Polk cranked up the political rhetoric with his proclamation to Congress that America’s “cup of forbearance has been exhausted, even before Mexico passed the boundary of the United States, invaded our territory, and shed American blood upon American soil.”

Congress obliged with a declaration of war, even though many northern Congressmen had issues with it.  The invasion of Mexico (an Exhorter nation) by “Old Fuss and Feathers” (an Exhorter general) was successful.  The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was a travesty, but it ceded the Southwest and California to the US on February 2, 1848.

As predicted by the political observant of the time, this treaty disrupted the tenuous balance of power over the slavery issue and effectively triggered the Civil War 13 years later. 

The defining tone of the rhetoric in that season leading up to the Civil War was hatred, personal demeaning and a deliberate focus on peripheral issues, instead of careful conversation about the core issues.  Whenever possible, complex issues were reduced to a simplistic right/wrong litmus test of political orthodoxy.

The same is true today.  Congressmen and women invited highly adversarial people as their guests at the SOTU, in order to fan the flames of division.  The press was extraordinary in seeking out sound bites that could be framed to offend.  And so, anger was empowered over our nation.

Leading up to the Civil War, religion was part of the problem, not the solution.  The Presbyterians, Baptists and Methodist all split their denominations over the issue.

In his epic Second Inaugural Address, Lincoln commented on that paradox.  

“Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding.  Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other.  It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged.  The prayers of both could not be answered.  That of neither has been answered fully.  The Almighty has His own purposes.”

Today there are passionate citizens in our Tribe who believe Donald Trump is God’s man, doing a majestic piece of work. 

 
There are others who are horrified at the man and consider him a plague on the earth.

And, as in the pre-Civil War era, civilized debate is hard to come by.  Positions are settled.  Tempers are hot.  Words are absolute. 

Relationships are fragile in the light of the radicalization of thought and the normalization of rejection and alienation.

In other words, we are positioning ourselves well for something awful if the inflammatory debate continues to escalate. 

What is the alternative?

I start with the Curse of Jotham.  Jotham appealed to God.  God agreed with His complaint and the two sides in the subsequent localized civil war destroyed each other.  And that is what happened with America.  The slaves cried out to God for justice.  He heard.  And America lost over 600,000 people in direct deaths during our Civil War in addition to an incalculable collateral damage to the nation.
Compare that with 400,000 US deaths in WWII.

It behooves each leader in the Tribe to revisit the abundance of passages in Scripture about leaders who abuse those under them.  The American church has chewed up and spit out a stupendous number of people in the last 50 years. 

We will have no moral or spiritual authority when we have not handled leadership authority with integrity.

Second, the crisis was triggered by illegitimacy in fact, but was rooted in illegitimacy of the spirit. 

Abimelech was the son of a concubine, not one of Gideon’s many wives.  Illegitimate.

 But the core issue was Gideon’s legitimacy struggles.   In spite of all the drama leading up to the battle with     the Midianites and the enormity of the victory over   them, he still lacked legitimacy.

That is why he demanded as booty enough gold to make himself an ephod – a priestly garment. God had called him to military and political leadership.  In that place, God would bless him.

When he reached for legitimacy through spiritual posturing, it became toxic for the entire nation.  

So each individual needs to explore his own basis for legitimacy.  To the degree that we use spiritual posturing to prop up a deficient sense of legitimacy, to that degree we will have no moral or spiritual authority in the nation.

Finally is the issue of rights and responsibilities.  The anger throughout our nation, on the right and the left, is rooted in a focus on rights. 

No matter what the issue, whether personal or global, the bias toward rights inflames debate.  Nowhere do you see that more clearly than the great religious debates.  Few of them are directed by builders, doers, people deeply invested in their personal responsibility.

Today, more and more Christians opt out of voting.  Most opt out of researching judges and obscure issues.  Few believers understand the electoral process and fewer still have bothered to ever attend a precinct meeting.  And hardly any could name two city officials in the town where they live – much less the issues facing them.

Next time someone scalds you for having a political view that they don’t share, walk away from the conflict and look inside to see where you could raise the bar on your own personal responsibility as a citizen. 

My belief is that the external climate is going to continue to spiral down for a period of time.

It behooves us as believers to be seriously concerned about raising the level of our spiritual authority.

That comes one choice at a time, not one argument at a time.
 
Arthur Burk
February 2019

Analysis

And, gang, Arthur is spot-on right. We are not getting it. In many ways we are speaking into an echo chamber with uncivil debate and discussion that rips asunder sworn friendships.

We have not learned how to interact the way Ginsberg and Scalia interacted.

And we have little basis for viewing through the opposing party’s views and hunt for the win/win.

As a result we are seeing the Sixth Head of Leviathan unleashed, Jotham’s Curse brought down upon us in our mutual wrath, and very little effort invested in skilled discussion of each of the issues.

Instead we would rather see how quickly we can tear appear Democrats as not Christian because of the slaughter of the innocent.

Where is the skillful work for the win/win?

If we vaunt one Commandment and ignore the other nine, where does that leave us?

If we laud the principles governing human relationships but scoff the principles governing nature, what do we have?

Indeed, were we to consider our own position worth cinsidering and only scoff competing positions, whether we think the evidence is worth our time or no, where does that leave us?

Unwilling to humanize one another.

Schlepping toward the sea faster than you can say “Second Level of Principles.”

And I think perhaps, Arthur was hearing some of the anger of the land.

So, what’s it gonna be, gang?

Deeper authority is available for those willing to pay the price to earn it, in deeper realms than we are currently thinking.

Or we can continue the madness of ignoring the principles and assuming we can argue our way into safety.

I was always told that there was more I had to offer….

And someone spoke up and said that, for a long time, they had a desire to support me, which is a humbling reality.

So, evidently, my blog is moving to another domain, and as that domain is released, I will attempt to export my content from here to that new blog.

And as things get set up there, I will notify all of y’all to update your following settings, so as to continue to access me.

Kindest Regards,
The Paraclete’s Hammer

Sally gets the run-around and a huge workout in the Sapphire tribe. Here is another of her testimonies.

I don’t know what this group thinks about theophostics. But basically they teach when something bothers me I need to ask the Holy Spirit when is the first time I felt this way. Follow whatever path He leads me on, even if it makes NO sense. When I get to the initiating event, ask Him what is the lie I was believing at that point, and then what is the Truth He wants me to know about it instead. Just to show how crazy the path can be, my husband’s pen clicking led to my grandfather’s open mouth chewing and spewing saliva at the table, to a revulsion of all the germs, to my mom vigorously washing me off every time I was touched by locals as a baby when we lived were overseas as missionaries and germs were rampant. As an RN she was terrified of me getting sick. It ended up that I needed delivered from a spirit of death. that was 4 years ago. Pen clicking hasn’t bothered me since.

Word to the wise gang, and this cannot be overemphasized enough. Follow the trail, no matter where it goes and no matter how much sense it does or does not make.