Romans 13: 1-7 A Close Reading On Dealing With Governing Authorities

Gang, what follows are going to be a close reading of a chunk of text. Let’s get to it.

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from G-d, and those that exist have been instituted by G-d. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what G-d has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is G-d’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of G-d, an avenger who carries out G-d’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Romans 13:1-4

Class Is In Session

We have had people as tone-deaf as Jeff Sessions that have recently told us that we are to obey Romans 13. We have seen people in pulpits tell us that those who are elected rule over us.

However, there is a real sticking point here; namely, when someone that has been elected to SERVE and has been vested with STEWARDSHIP of the government machine, and they speak in their elected office to this sort of text, telling us to obey them, for me, that lands like the very summation of lorded authority of the Gentiles against which our L-rd Himself cautioned.

“I am in authority and you better listen to me.”

That sort of stuff butters my bacon.

Now, to what the text seems to mean.

Exegesis

“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities.”

Submit to those people who are actually in authority.

“The authorities that exist have been instituted by G-d.”

G-d puts people into authority. The mechanism can differ from place to place, but the King puts people into places where they are given legitimate authority.

I am under the impression that G-d respects the mindset and design of a given population. He knows if that country is going to set up a democracy, a republic, a dictatorship, a monarchy, or some other form, and He sets stipulations on the nature of that authority. And He works within the framework of that nation.

And, because of that, He knows where those people are going to set up the framework of authority and works with those frameworks if given the opportunity, for He is an opportunist indeed.

Meaning, I am of the take that He knows the framework of a republic and respects their drive to liberty, and in the case of us specifically, He works with THE SPECIFIC framework that is in place, in our case, a constitutional republic, in order to ensure maximum liberty and minimal control. Given the Exodus, and the preceding

For He is viciously committed to liberty over control.

Critical to the fabric of this nation, the United States, are the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, which guarantee Natural Law (and for those of us who are or have been connected to Sapphire Leadership Group, the natural law in Arthur Burk’s delineation refers to three levels of principles, universal, non-optional, cause-and-effect relationships: and those three levels are the priniciples that govern the relationship between Man and Matter; Man and Man, and Man and the Spirit Realm), which is necessitated by the reality of our humanity, remains a safeguard to us.

The Natural Law is therefore designed “to be a beast on the throat of the legislator to restrain him from writing any law and regulating any behavior and taxing any event, and transferring any wealth.”

In other words, it is designed to be a built-in backstop agains those precise excesses that would eventually subjugate us if taken to logical end.

Natural Law is part of the fabric of reality, and in Prophet Nations like the United States, principles and ideology and Natural Law in all three of its manifestations (the relationships between man and matter; man and man; and man and the spirit realm) lie closer to the surface of reality than in other nations. More than for even the Roman Republic, which was Redemptive Gift of Exhorter, we were designed to be a nation of laws. Equal rights before the law and equal accountability for violating the law.

And as a result of this reality, it is not a subset of us that rule us, as a substitute for the King, but the People themselves, the Electorate, that governs in part through the ballot box and in part through the application of Universal, Non-Optional, Cause-And-Effect Relationships, among other dynamics.

And if we govern to good and moral ends, according to the roots at our foundation, safeguarding the vulnerable and building something that is useful and beautiful and good (καλός), then we will reap the benefit of that and that form of governance will yield to the benefit of all. And if we fail in that enterprise, it will be to the detriment of all.

In all cases of political institutions, they have been endowed, elected, put in place, set up, or coronated, in order to be SERVANTS…..

MINISTERS….

EXECUTORS of the will of G-d. Protectors of the vulnerable and ensurors of the liberties given to us by our Creator, as articulated the wisdom of that beautiful Redemptive Gift Teacher, Thomas Jefferson, in both his first draft and final copy of the Declaration of Independence.

For those that question Jefferson on the slave issue, it is curious that in his first draft of the Declaration of Independence, he wrote the following as a challege to George III:

he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it’s most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.

While I believe this was the mind of the Founding Fathers, I believe the reason it was ultimately left out was as follows, and I share this YouTube clip because the reputation and research of the Teacher David McCullough is unimpeachable. Franklin, the Exhorter, helped things to be made more palatable for the times in such a way that the Continental Congress would approve the Declaration of Independence, while the fiery Prophet, John Adams, listened to all that was said:

Next point.

“Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what G-d has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is G-d’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain.”

Resisting true authority resists the will of G-d PRECISELY BECAUSE THEY ARE DESIGNED TO BE NOT A TERROR TO GOOD CONDUCT BUT TO BAD.

Period….

Do not come at me with “muh Nero”, “muh Nero”, “Paul wrote this while being subjected to one of the worst dictators in history, so you have to take that into account when reading this text”.

No, Paul is speaking to principles for the PROPER execution of government not with respect to his own political context, except to skillfully rebuke said context.

THE CONTEXT FOR ROMANS 13: THE PROPER AND BEST WORK OF THE EXHORTER

Romans 13, and, indeed, all of Romans, was written by the Exhorter Paul.

Note, I did not discuss his fivefold office. Rather I spoke in terms of his Redemptive Gift, which is tied to his design.

Back to the Redemptive Gift of Exhorter, for those who need a crash course of their core….

Exhorters, this is all you, more than the other six.

Exhorters WERE DESIGNED for solids in the following:

1) Because they might have a propensity below their best toward denial, G-d intends them to skillfully break BREAK DENIAL. They have an active imagination, and they usually have one single message that predominates throughout the course of their life. And that imagination was made to break the denial of a culture that cannot stay away from non-reality in terms of politics, communication, media, corporate behavior, government behavior, and the way Christ designed us to function as a redemptive body.

2) Because they can get wonky with being all over the place due to their social butterfly nature, G-d intends them for spiritual ASTROREGULATION, namely to bring the steadiness of regulation to those big-spirited people in their constellation. For the Exhorter, given the context of the Fourth Day with its focus on the rotating, revolving, and regularity of the Sun, Moon, and Stars, nay, all the galactic bodies, G-d intends them to be the most regular, and the most steady of the gifts when it comes to flow of horizontal relationships. Too many Exhorters run to their capacity to influence people to do their agenda, often at the risk of people’s stability, but the design is that the Exhorter help provide a safe place in time and in the context of the broad horizontal frame of their human relationships to have something steady, a Northern Star of sorts, on which they can count when everything else fails. Like the eclipses and the celestial phenomenon are among the most regular and predictable, and therefore worst prophetic timepieces in existence to calculate eschatological phenomenon, so also the Exhorter is MADE for predictability and reliability, if they will get their time under control and discipline themselves with the principles of time stewardship, so others can have that friend who is skilled and capable at helping to unpack the needful dynamics pertaining to human relationships.

3) Contrary to how many Exhorters function, flying by the seat of their pants and having very little under self-control when it comes to their schedule, G-d intends the Exhorter to TO USE TIME WELL (see Jesus’ usage of his time during His earthly ministry in the Gospels). Maria Woodworth-Etter had it wrong when she said, “Better to wear out for Jesus than rust out.” Jesus never meant for us to embrace that false dichotomy. We were never designed to wear out. No, we were designed to approach each day and complete each day with a mindset that we have left it all on the field of play, but not to the point of beyond exhaustion. Worn-out is not kingdom. Well-used is.

4). Finally, the Exhorter, with their many words, was made to COMMUNICATE THE CONCEPTS OF THE SPIRIT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE SOUL, AND SHOW CAUSE AND EFFECT.

5) The Exhorter was made to speak in such a way that emphasizes the nature of G-d, most particularly as articulated in the person, work, and actions of Jesus.

In the context of Romans 13, Paul is not sharing principles based on what he saw in the empire of the time, nor any other political model. Rather, He was revealing the nature of leadership as found in the King of Kings. And he was laying out prerequisites and principles for how ultimately legitimate leadership functions.

BACK TO THE TEXT

Given this context, consider the following. My interpretation:

Translation: If an authority is terrorizing good conduct, G-d did not set that authority in place, and they will ultimately reap the consequences of their actions. And you are under no obligation to follow their edicts.

There are a variety of ways to respond to those edicts. You must learn the skill of developing creativity when responding to the behavior of tyrants.

Further, when leaders are tyrannically behaving, G-d will provide correctives.

Paging Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Dr. Bonhoeffer, your nation needs action.

AUTHORITY

ἐξουσία is the legal right to act that precedes the event of acting, and Paul’s usage here of ἐξουσία throughout Romans 13 refers to the legitimacy to issue decisions. It is the common word for “authority”, meaning the word “authority” is the most common way to translate that word.

And all authority is derived or given. Given by G-d the Father through Jesus Christ to us, and we are responsible to steward that authority well. As are those in government. And those of us who are in leadership. In this nation, We The People were vested with strong authority, and we are designed to walk in that authority well, whether or not we actually act on that design.

If a governing authority uses the authority given to them for wicked purposes, for curtailing people’s capacity to speak up or advocate for those things they believe, then their authority may legitimately be called into question, and should be disagreed with, and resisted.

Either that person is G-d’s servant to you FOR GOOD, in which case he or she should be listened to and hearkened unto, or he IS NOT that sort of godly servant and should be corrected, called to account, or ignored.

We have too many people that read Romans 13:1-2 and ignore the limiting factor of verses 3 and 4. Conditionally, authorities set in place by G-d are set up precisely in order to terrorize bad conduct, not good conduct. They are not designed to control the law-abiding. Rather, they are designed to liberate the law-abiding.

FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO ARGUE ABOUT RIGHTS VERSUS RESPONSIBILITIES

Now, before someone starts talking about rights vs. responsibilities, which is a legitimate concern, we need to ask the question, “did they impose legitimate responsiblities with care WHILE ALSO respecting our rights?”

Did they honor the dynamic tension between rights and responsibilities? Are the rights and responsibilities both present and in right proportion according to the L-rd’s design?

Had our rights been curtailed for the sake of imposing legitimate responsibilities, then that would be one thing. In the case of our current institutions, I would contend that they have not legitimately curtailed a number of our rights (see, for example, the debacle surrounding the curtailing of civil liberties and the forced injection of untested foreign substances during the proliferation of the Wuhan Coronavirus), and they have imposed responsibilities that are also illegitimate (masks and injections don’t work, and things that do work, when we used those, we were gaslit repeatedly to a place of fear and intimidation).

They (after the fashion of Bushelbritches, the Honorable Sheriff of Nottingham from Disney’s Robin Hood, taxed the heart and soul out of the citizenry, regardless of social or economic status, while crowing about “fair share”, and have further used the revenues from taxation fraudulently, earning the reaping of certain curses, of whose current status we might be unaware.

Repeatedly, they have shown themselves other than properly aligned for our good, and rather against us.

For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is G-d’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of G-d, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. -Romans 13:3-4 ESV-

If you do wrong, be afraid…..What are these elected officials afraid of? If they are currently not experiencing the consequences of the L-rd’s judgment, then something in the system of justice is broken, and I suggest that perhaps someone is engaging in the violations that would lead to at least two particular curses, which I will discuss at a later point: the Aramean Curse and the Canaanite Curse.

If you insist on lying and refusing to walk in the execution of the truth, then be afraid of those who have authority over you.

For they will become increasingly less charitable and merciful and will seek to execute justice and judgment. They will decide concerning you, and not necessarily in a merciful fashion.

For the kings of the nation do not bear the sword in vain. The sword could be construed as a literal sword or weapon, as in modern-day case, a firearm, or it could be symbolic of some type of authority that stops tyranny, spiritual or otherwise, by which those who are ruled are corrected.

In our nation, given the 1st and the 2nd Amendment, and given we are a constitutional republic, and given I think the L-rd respects unique forms of government, I am of the interpretation that that is a reference to us. We do not carry the authority we have been given through natural law in vain. And given we have been given the right to speak up when abuse is happening, we also have the responsibility to correct it in a multitude of ways.

Freedom of Speech, Freedom to Assemble, Freedom to Petition for Redress, and if need be, the Right to vote them out, among other things.

Ultimately, what this boils down to is we are responsible in this nation to see to it that the government is so managable, and power is kept in such check and these elected officials are held in such accountability through the execution of the natural law, that they should be afraid of the consequences of attempting to violate that law and abusing us.

And submission to someone who is committed to your best and highest level of liberty, and committed to your good no matter what should be no difficult thing.

The problem is, we have never truly seen what “the good” and “the King’s best” truly look like.

Just some thoughts.

Blessing 14: September WOR Blessing: Psalm 42:10

Beloved,

I invite your spirit forward to treat with me, regardless of what status it or they are in.

Spirit, I recognize the pain of assault and the trouble that comes when you are traumatized, and the shattering of the human spirit that takes place when ritual abuse occurs.

Spirit, listen to the word of G-d for you for today.

Be still and know I am G-d

Psalm 46:10

Spirit, there is a place following the trauma of a harsh season or following mistreatment of harsh leaders.

G-d can and often might place us in proximity to harsh leaders.

Note what I said versus what I did not say.

Consider the following also, spirit

Although he was a son, he learned obedience by the things he suffered.

Hebrews 5:8 ESV

There may be times when G-d allows you to connect with harsh leaders in order to refine you.

I don’t guarantee it will happen. In fact I hope it doesn’t happen. But in case you end up dealing with a difficult or harsh leader, I want you to remember one thing in the still place following mistreatment.

He is G-d. And He will coach you in very difficult times.

You will also note I did not say G-d sets us under harsh people in order that they would abuse us.

Abuse happens, but I don’t see it as from the hand of G-d. I do however see our response as capable of coming from the hand of G-d.

I bless you following a difficult situation to get really still and to occupy the still place and to lean into the King deeply.

I bless you to walk in stillness and to take advantage of that stillness in order to receive deep clarity.

I bless you in that season to find out how Father wants you to respond and to deeply know Him in intimacy.

I bless you to find deeper intimacy regardless of the current pain.

I bless you to speak to Yeshua, who is capable of taking all pain. I bless each of you, parts, to just be and to appropriate whatever of King’s love in whatever manner you deem necessary.

I bless your enforcers in their anger to express that anger and frustration and to ask the questions they need to ask. This is a safe space for them.

I bless you to know what is meant by fellowshipping with the King in His sufferings.

I bless you to participate with Him in a deep and satisfying connection.

And most importantly, I bless you to, in the still place, for your parts that which to occupy that space, to occupy that space in time and to fill that space with the knowledge of Him.

I bless you with dignity and grace and love and affection and wholeness.

And above all, I bless you, spirit, and relevant parts to know you belong.

You belong, dear heart.

In stillness, you belong.

I bless you to know Him as G-d, spirit, in the name of Yeshua.

So be it.

G-d Can’t Be Pro-Life, ‘Cause He Killed Babies…Or Can He (An Analysis of Some Texts, Using Other Texts)?

AN INTRODUCTION AND SOME CUSTOMARY PROVOKING STATEMENTS

Because New York passed an abortion law or some such thing, people all of a sudden have started to talk about and exegete the news.


It has been raised as an argument against those who might be pro-life that G-d cannot be pro-life, since, in the Bible, and specifically, in the Torah, he killed babies.


I rarely discuss current events at the same time they are happening. But today I will make an exception.
ollie north
Check that. Two exceptions.


#elliotabrams

It is uncomfortable to talk about how unrighteous our government’s actions are in the area of abortion and talking about how righteous a pro-life stance is, while turning the blind eye to the warhawking anti-life nature of conducting police state actions overseas, that are the purview of Republicans and Democrats alike.

Back to what I was talking about, seriously. Sometimes we want to excuse our government’s stupidity by an appeal to one issue, when there are a breadth of issues at play. And such exegesis gets sloppy.

Some days, our exegesis, which can turn to support one group or party over another, is only painted with broad strokes that Scripture does not use.

And when it comes to Scripture, sometimes our exegesis boils down to making sure that the G-d in the right hand side of the Bible apologizes for the actions of the G-d in the left hand side of the Bible.


But here is how I would processionally explain the actions of the G-d on the left hand side of the book, in seven elements.

Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever. Hebrews 13:8

PREFACING THE SEVEN ELEMENTS: IS HE REALLY AS MEAN AS SOME SAY?

Consider also the fact that the “kinder, gentler” guy on the right hand side of the book, at the end of the right hand side, plagued the whole earth and wiped out a million here and there, in case we think the guy on the right hand side has more reformed ways.


Translation: parsing the Old Testament G-d and the New Testament G-d out from each other as distinct causes the whole book to fall apart greatly. Truly, they are one and the same. Revelation teaches us that. And His Judgment is His mercy.

BACKGROUND TEXTS FOR RECONCILING THE TWO PARTS

G-d, on the other hand, as Scripture RELENTLESSLY teaches throughout both the Tanakh and the New Testament, gives space for people to repent and reform before He executes against them.


Cue cluster of texts that show G-d’s mercy and granting people space and breathing room to repent before He judges.

  • Jonah 3-4, where G-d relents/repents after the capital of the flaying Assyrians repents.
  • Revelation 2:21, where G-d gave Jezebel space to repent
  • Genesis 15:16, where G-d gave the Amorites space to repent, that He didn’t have to, and would have caused something to work out between Israel and the Amorites had they repented.
  • Genesis 18:17-19, where G-d debated what he would share with Abraham, knowing Abraham’s righteousness, knowing Abraham’s heart to cry out for mercy, and knowing that Abraham was able to affect G-d’s heart because Abraham was the friend of G-d in only the way Givers can be.
  • Deuteronomy 2:9 and Judges 11:17, where G-d gave Moab their land, and commanded Israel not to harrass them, even before Moab fought against Israel (Joshua 24:9). This could have led to Moab’s national repentance and a reconciliation and commerce between Moab and Israel. And even when the national reconciliation did not take place, G-d STILL played out the drama that should have been between Moab and Israel in the story of Ruth and Boaz.
  • Genesis 46:4, where G-d SENT Israel down to Egypt, and G-d DWELT WITH Israel IN Egypt, and during which season, Israel had centuries to get to know her G-d, and the Amorites had space to repent and prepare the land for the ISRAELITES, which could have happened instead of their destruction.
  • Genesis 47:6, where Pharaoh gave favor to Israel in the land of Egypt and with the pagan ruler of Egypt.
  • Isaiah 19:24-25, where the L-rd will ultimately bring about redemption of the Egyptian nation, and the Egyptian nation will occupy the first place. SECONDLY, <GASP>, pagan, flaying, barbaric Assyria. And third, Israel.
  • Exodus 4:22-23, where G-d first reveals to a pagan nation His name of “Father”. He then commands, before the first drop of water turns to blood and before the first frog touches the land and dies, Egypt to LET HIS SON GO. And then the judgments start and increase.
    • And yes, one can argue G-d kept Pharaoh from repenting, because of Exodus 4:21 and 7:3, but to merely argue that is to see only part of the whole narrative. Psalm 115:16, “the highest heavens belong to the L-rd, but the earth he has given to the sons of men.” G-d has given people free will to choose what they will or will not do. He does not always get what He wants.
  • From the point above, through the entire sequence of issues, the L-rd showed the Egyptians what they had done in infant genocide towards the men of Israel (Exodus 1:22, note the waters turning to blood in 7:17-21 revealed the death that was in the water and the blood that was on the Egyptian hands). The Tenth Plague was the progressive outflow of the response of the Egyptian injustice of Israelite genocide. Again, there are causes and effects. And when you sow the cause, you will reap the effects.
  • Let me point out also the counsel of G-d in Exodus 9:19; He told the Egyptian people to gather their flocks and herds to keep them from the hail. Some listened, and some did not. There were Egyptians who had livestock that kept them in from the hail and their livestock was spared. This opened the door for some of them to turn. G-d uses every circumstance to bring people to Him, including His judgments.
  • Recall also Exodus 12:49, which could plausibly imply that, during the plagues, there were some Egyptians in the nation that chose to follow the G-d of Israel, and chose to align themselves with Israel, and celebrated the Passover. Even if there were none that did actually align with Israel, He still made provision for that.
  • The book of Joshua is completely devoted to the destruction of whole nations while the Israelites possessed the Promised Land.

Element 1: G-d’s decisions, even those decisions that result in human death, are ALWAYS executed in the context of His mercy and His justice, which are the twin facets of His love. What will drive His children to seek Him?


Element 2: G-d’s purposes are aimed at a long-game strategy. He weighs all decisions with an eye toward redemption and how they will impact eternity and His house.


Element 3: G-d aims to eradicate sin, rebellion, iniquity, and abomination from the earth.


Element 4: G-d’s yearning desire is to walk among us, be our G-d, and for us to be His people. Whatever keeps that community from happening He may remove from us.

Element 5: G-d looks for the fruit on the tree. He looks for fresh water or salt, hot water or cold, humility or assertion, upness or downness, filiality or bridality. He looks for consistency that He can utilize. He looks for and brings organized sequence.


Element 6: Sin twists and perverts the good, and that twisting is revealed in the fruit of the tree that is planted. G-d despises things that twist and mar.
Element 7: Everything G-d is, does, or permits to happen is ALWAYS with an eye toward straightening out the twistedness.


Look, it is not like G-d on a bipolar whim massacred millions of innocent babies in an unprovoked rage.

He gave all of these nations, including Mizraim, CENTURIES to repent. And when a culture of death and murder is embraced, somewhere down the line, death is going to be result, and the empire that embraces death is going to self-devour.


He exposed the Egyptian culture for the death-bringing culture it had become. Blood was already in the waters before the first plague. He just forced the nation to see the blood that was in the water. He untwisted the reality of the waters. And in so doing, He allowed all of those baby boys’ blood to testify (Hebrews 12:24).


The Golden Calf is an example of a culture self-devouring. The Levites massacred 3,000 of their own families and so were ordained through G-d’s warring against the defiled spirit of idolatry.


National sin has national consequences. Longstanding sin has consequences. G-d even showed longsuffering toward the residents of Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities on the plain, and Lot interceded for Zoar, and as a result, G-d spared that city.


And one of the names of G-d (Exodus 34:5-6) is The L-rd Who Is Longsuffering.


G-d is not Hitler, G-d is not Pol Pot, G-d is not Stalin, and G-d is not Mao.
And it is not really the church’s job to justify the behavior of G-d to others. G-d can work in, around, and through our objections and the obstacles. But we have to recognize that the principles of Scripture do work. Sexual sin has sexual consequences, murderous sin has murderous consequences. Abortive sin has abortive consequences. Actions do have reactions. Sum of the Forces, Newtonian approximations, and all that jazz.

And Jezebel’s genocide resulted in her blood being shed.


And Naboth’s Vineyard landed on Ahab’s head.


The Principles work, without prejudice, and without caring what you think about how nice G-d or anyone else is.

And ultimately, G-d can work every situation to His glory.


But for us, now is the time to wake up, acknowledge reality in the stead of hiding from it, and bless New York, as we should have, instead of cursing it.

G-d was there first, and this decision on New York’s part is not helped by cursing New York. Rather, gang, let’s not carry on with eighty-five reams of conversation, and instead work with what we know about the Giver and Exhorter design of the state and Manhattan, respectively.


Bless the Giver and the Exhorter dynamic of that state.
Just some thoughts here, gang.

The End or Clause of Three Segments in Ephesians 5-6: Qualifying Statements on Authority and Submission

The above image shows a parallel between these three items. Not to rule over, but to LEAD well into the things of Christ. And now, look at for each of you, what that looks like, and increase the understanding of what that love looks like.

Husbands, what does it look like to lead wives with love without demanding submission, but rather with a tenderness and affection that nonverbally commands their respect? There is a massive difference between demanding respect and commanding respect. One difference is in your earned authority. Think deeply about what it looks like to earn authority and walk in your office of husband properly.

I understand that abuse of spouses has led to lack of basic trust. I was the victim of spousal abuse.

Before we launch into a diatribe of how one side or the other of this equation is missing the boat, let’s handle our own issues, woundedness, trauma, parts, and sin, rebellion, iniquity, and abomination. We have to grow into all things in Him, which means, we speak to the fullness of these dynamics.

So, our responsibility is to flesh out the hard questions.

Indeed, we will have to eventually look at the concept of submission. Wives, once trust has been actually restored, beyond mutual respect, what does that ugly S-word a look like in the context of a husband’s affection? Affirming the design of your husband or wife (the building and warrior dynamics of your spouse) and affirming the where of their design for leadership, what does that complex thing look like?

Fathers, what kind of method includes instruction and training that does not exasperate or provoke to wrath or exasperation?

Masters, what does it look like to lead those who serve you without threats?

Believers, what does it look like to supply/making supplication for your household of fellows in Christ?

Ponder this with me, builders and warriors.

Not, “what has John MacArthur or Beth Moore or Arthur Burk said?”, but what are the Lord and your spirit saying about these items?