Listening to God, and waiting on Him

God, am I leaping ahead of your plan?  Or have I contented myself with the discipline you have set aside for me while you are preparing your plan for me. Lord, may I never leap ahead of your plan or turn aside from it.  Help me today, since your mercies are new every morning, to stay singularly focused.  Help me to take the counsel that is from you as I wait on you, so that my waiting does not turn into sloth.

Numbers 16: Korah’s Rebellion

Wow…
The nerve.
You would think that they would be greatful.  You would think they had learned to trust God after the seven, eight, or ten times (depending on which events you counted in the Torah) that they rebelled and the Lord punished.  From death by quail, to plagues and heathen Canaanite troops.  However, here is the oncoming foolishness of yet another rebellion, this time among the Levite tribe.  Moses’ near relative, Korah, whose clan was responsible for the holy things, including the Lampstand, Incense altar, Presence table, plates, utensils, dishes, bowls, and the ark (Numbers 4:1-20).  Yet, they want more.  Let’s read
 

1 Now Korah the son of Izhar, the son of Kohath, the son of Levi, with Dathan and Abiram the sons of Eliab, and On the son of Peleth, sons of Reuben, took men; 2 and they rose up before Moses with some of the children of Israel, two hundred and fifty leaders of the congregation, representatives of the congregation, men of renown.

Leadership has an internal breakdown.  Leadership of the nation of Israel gathers together.

 3 They gathered together against Moses and Aaron,

They gathered against Moses and specifically against Aaron, who had the role of Priest.

and said to them, “You take too much upon yourselves, for all the congregation is holy, every one of them, and the LORD is among them. Why then do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the LORD?”

Arguing for the priesthood of all the Jews.  I mean that sounds pretty fair, given the rest of the Levites equality to appear before God.
However, there was something deeper at work here.  What Korah was doing was much more devious. He was violating what was already set down in Torah.  He wanted to rewrite his duties and he wanted more than God had called for him to operate in.  God had already set a process down just a few chapters earlier, and other aspects of the same process were set up in Exodus.

4 So when Moses heard it, he fell on his face;

A sign of humility in Moses (Numbers 12:3).

5 and he spoke to Korah and all his company, saying, “Tomorrow morning the LORD will show who is His and who is holy, and will cause him to come near to Him.

As if they were needed any other confirmation.  Even in their rebellion, God was willing to give them more proof.  Nevermind that they were about to lose their lives in the process of God’s establishment of the priesthood.  However, that is what happens when you speak against an actual anointed person.  God guards his true priests and his true prophets.

That one whom He chooses He will cause to come near to Him.

This was what God was going to do anyway.  He was going to cause Aaron and his descendants after him to come before Him.
Another thing that this demonstrates is the following.  Korah was challenging God, who can arbitrarily set things up any way He wants.  God does respond well to questioning when it arises from a heart of honest humble inquiry.  Nevertheless, God does not respond kindly to questioning when it arises from a heart that wants to challenge His authority and holiness.  This challenge from Korah and his associates arises not from humility and honest inquiry but from a heart that seeks to challenge the authority and holiness of God.

 6 Do this: Take censers, Korah and all your company; 7 put fire in them and put incense in them before the LORD tomorrow, and it shall be that the man whom the LORD chooses is the holy one.

Moses is saying, “You want to function as a priest, and pretend to be holy and set apart for that task.  God ahead and try.  See what God does when we choose to flagrantly disregard what He has told us to do.”

You take too much upon yourselves, you sons of Levi!”

Exactly.
8 Then Moses said to Korah, “Hear now, you sons of Levi: 9 Is it a small thing to you that the God of Israel has separated you from the congregation of Israel, to bring you near to Himself, to do the work of the tabernacle of the LORD, and to stand before the congregation to serve them; 10and that He has brought you near to Himself, you and all your brethren, the sons of Levi, with you? And are you seeking the priesthood also? 11 Therefore you and all your company are gathered together against the LORD. And what is Aaron that you complain against him?”
As if Aaron was something that they should complain against him.  What they were really doing, if you read the Torah to this point, and saw the duties assigned to different groups, was to violate God, and assault His order, and to gather together against Him.

12 And Moses sent to call Dathan and Abiram the sons of Eliab, but they said, “We will not come up! 13 Is it a small thing that you have brought us up out of a land flowing with milk and honey, to kill us in the wilderness, that you should keep acting like a prince over us? 14 Moreover you have not brought us into a land flowing with milk and honey, nor given us inheritance of fields and vineyards. Will you put out the eyes of these men? We will not come up!”

The promise of a land flowing with milk and honey did not come from Moses, but from God (Exodus 3:8).

15 Then Moses was very angry, and said to the LORD, “Do not respect their offering. I have not taken one donkey from them, nor have I hurt one of them.”

God respected Moses’ plea, even though it could have come from a heart of anger and vengeance.  Thoughts?

16 And Moses said to Korah, “Tomorrow, you and all your company be present before the LORD—you and they, as well as Aaron. 17 Let each take his censer and put incense in it, and each of you bring his censer before the LORD, two hundred and fifty censers; both you and Aaron, each with his censer.” 18 So every man took his censer, put fire in it, laid incense on it, and stood at the door of the tabernacle of meeting with Moses and Aaron. 19 And Korah gathered all the congregation against them at the door of the tabernacle of meeting.

So, here is the process by which they were going to decide who was the priest set apart by God for God.

Then the glory of the LORD appeared to all the congregation.

The judge gets ready to fulfill His role.

20 And the LORD spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying, 21 “Separate yourselves from among this congregation, that I may consume them in a moment.”  22 Then they fell on their faces, and said, “O God, the God of the spirits of all flesh, shall one man sin, and You be angry with all the congregation?”   23 So the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, 24 “Speak to the congregation, saying, ‘Get away from the tents of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram.’”  25 Then Moses rose and went to Dathan and Abiram, and the elders of Israel followed him. 26 And he spoke to the congregation, saying, “Depart now from the tents of these wicked men! Touch nothing of theirs, lest you be consumed in all their sins.” 27 So they got away from around the tents of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram; and Dathan and Abiram came out and stood at the door of their tents, with their wives, their sons, and their little children.
28 And Moses said: “By this you shall know that the LORD has sent me to do all these works, for I have not done them of my own will. 29 If these men die naturally like all men, or if they are visited by the common fate of all men, then the LORD has not sent me. 30 But if the LORD creates a new thing, and the earth opens its mouth and swallows them up with all that belongs to them, and they go down alive into the pit, then you will understand that these men have rejected the LORD.”

If…then….   So many of us do not understand if/then statements.  Rather, we take them as accusations, when they are not.

31 Now it came to pass, as he finished speaking all these words, that the ground split apart under them, 32 and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up, with their households and all the men with Korah, with all their goods. 33 So they and all those with them went down alive into the pit; the earth closed over them, and they perished from among the assembly.

Wow! So they really were challenging the Lord.
34 Then all Israel who were around them fled at their cry, for they said, “Lest the earth swallow us up also!” 35 And a fire came out from the LORD and consumed the two hundred and fifty men who were offering incense. 36 Then the LORD spoke to Moses, saying: 37 “Tell Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, to pick up the censers out of the blaze, for they are holy, and scatter the fire some distance away.
38 The censers of these men who sinned against their own souls, let them be made into hammered plates as a covering for the altar. Because they presented them before the LORD, therefore they are holy; and they shall be a sign to the children of Israel.”
Signs are useful for caution, for dangers, for warnings, for direction, for locations, for marking routes, and for setting limits.
39 So Eleazar the priest took the bronze censers, which those who were burned up had presented, and they were hammered out as a covering on the altar, 40 to be a memorial to the children of Israel that no outsider, who is not a descendant of Aaron, should come near to offer incense before the LORD, that he might not become like Korah and his companions, just as the LORD had said to him through Moses.
Even though they violated God’s order, they did things that caused their tools, the censers, to become set apart.  God still respected the use of the tools, and incorporated them into the work of the temple, and to function as a reminder of God’s judgement that day.  And Judson Cornwall tells us in “Incense and Insurrection” that bronze was used in the tabernacle in places that dealt with judgement, most notably the brazen altar, where God dealt with and judged the sins of Israel on all days, except for once a year, on Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement.  He judged and acquitted at the brazen altar.  He judged Korah, and had that bronze attached to the brazen altar.  It was a memorial and a testimony that God had confirmed his word.

prayers.

Okay, Lord, so I am ready to hear what you have to say, so say it.  Am I too late for this thing.  No, nothing is too late for You, and nothing is impossible for You.  I haven’t done certain things, and You know what is still lacking.  So, I ask you, to help me out here, and do what I cannot do.  If I am supposed to take that test and move or transfer because I am supposed to be in a different area, then let me know.   Help me, and lead me, instruct me in the way I am to go. If I am supposed to be in this realm, then let me know.  Finally, if I am doing the right thing right now, then please let me know that too.  Thank You for Your amazing patience and for Your grace in my life.  I appreciate what you have done for me.  I am very excited about what is in store for me.  Your will is to be done.

Yale, Sunday School Class and other thoughts.

Today was a really weird day…

Okay, so after choir, I found myself in Sunday School class and made a little bit of a fool of myself.  Got into a heated disagreement with the teacher over the nature of people following their salvation.  I took one of my teachers’ positions on the nature of our identity in Christ.  A segment of people at our church, it seems, appear to believe in the existence of a dual redeemed-spiritual/fleshly-sinful nature in the believer, and use Romans 7 as their basis.  I was asked to leave the class.  May God forgive me for not conducting myself with more humility and temperance.  I will eat the humble pie given me.  God, I felt like such a hypocrite today.

You have no idea how frequently I deal with and fight those thoughts.  And how frequently that happens to believers.  We need to learn as believers, the measure of potential within us, and learn an attitude of consistency. We also need to give thought to the fact from Scripture is that, once redeemed, we are not this twisted, dualistic person with two natures.  This still fallen carnal sinful nature and this spiritual holy nature, both residing inside us.  Rather, from Scripture, it would seem, that the sins are erased and we are transformed into a new creation.  The blot of original sin and our nature is erased, and we are given a new nature.  The nature “in Christ.”  We are now reworked trash cans, or poor old sinners save by grace.

Now when the temptation to sin comes, that temptation comes from without, and we still live in the carnal world.  However, in the moment of our temptation (which is not the act of sinning), we have a choice.  We choose how we are going to respond to that temptation, which is external to us.  And we can choose every single time to sin, or not to sin.  Every single time.  And we can choose to live a life of humility in Christ 100 percent of the time, or we can choose to…whatever the temptation is, to yield to it.

The question is, as my friend Matt Barksdale used to say, when we co-led a bible study, “Whatcha gonna do?”

See this day, I have set before you a choice, living or dying, blessing or cursing.  Therefore, choose life.  Choose it, every single time.

On another topic…

I am somewhat convinced that some of my friends think I have gone off the deep end, applying to Yale Divinity School and all.  Some people have told me to “only go where the truth is preached.”  Odd thing about that advice is there is only one place where the truth really is preached, and that is at the throne room of Christ.  Others have said, “why Yale? Do you know how liberal it is out there? Do you know how many professors out there are ready to yadda yadda?”

On the other hand, I have had some very supportive people who have said that they always knew this about me, and like the idea of my application.  I have always known something since 2001 when Dr. Witek, my British Modernist Poetry professor said to me that I would make a great teacher.  I have known I would make quite a fit in the lecture hall, ready to mold the next generation of young minds who were going to go on to become the leaders of the world to come.

To those of you who have supported me, I appreciate your support.  To those of you who have questioned my intents or choices, I appreciate your willingness to be honest with me.

I hope we both like what we see, should I get accepted and a good scholarship, on the other side of this experience…

I am so ready and glad to step out into my calling that I can hardly wait another minute, let alone three months to find out if I have been accepted.

The New Year….what is going to be different.

Besides the usual resolutions…


To the left is a picture of my wife, Kresha, and me at the home of a friend of ours.  We had just celebrated our 5th anniversary and my 30th birthday (both on the 14th).  


Last Sunday morning, she told me about some conviction she was experiencing in our life.  That is, she was planning all of these various good resolutions, which in and of themselves are good.  While preparing them, the Lord said to her, “these resolutions may be good to you, but this year, I want you to focus on Me.  Make your one resolution to know Me this coming year.”


This is what we have been failing to do in the past year.  We have been failing to make the Lord and our communiity’commmunion with him a priority.  Instead, we were chasing things like, “beat debt” and “burn fat.”  We have been seeking a revolutionized marriage without including him in the equation.  The focus had become the resolutions.


This year, our resolution is Psalm 27:4, as we have been hearing reiterated from the multitude of witnesses, not the least of which has been each other, our church, and Mike Bickle, among others.  It is our desire to “dwell in his house, and to gaze upon his beauty, and to inquire at his temple.” Our intent will be to make that the context for our other activity, and for me, not the least of which includes my blogging.  


I appreciate the few and far between visits my blog receives and trust it is as much a blessing to my readers as it is to me to publish it. 


I am honored to know several in the blogging community, notably Brian Fulthorp, Joel Watts, and to a much lesser extent, Jim West.  Their valuable insight has pushed me to the furthest ends of reflection on the things which matter most, and I am honored to call two of these friends.  


I look forward to the New Year, and the new challenges that come alongside it. 


May this year be the best yet, and in the words of one list, may we “live life to the fullest.”  Jim, my condolences on the loss of your grammatical sanity, as I know what constitutes this rankling.  

Aviad Cohen and Messianic Judaism

Not sure how I feel out this. It seems to me that Judaism is a bit of a mixed bag for the believer.  Even if that sounds like a contradiction for me to make, based on some of my previous sentiment.  I am always open to readjustment on these issues.


The following was from Aviad Cohen, the believing rapper and ex-Jew.  It would be interesting to know what some of my believing friends, both Jewish and non-Jewish, think about this.  Note, I stay away from the term Gentile.


I recieved this from a brother. It appears there is another witness to the Truth that I believe Yahweh is revealing concerning Messianic Judaism. Unleavened Torah is unleavened by both professing Christianity as well as Messianic Judaism and must be exposed. -bk

Date: September 8, 2008
Program: Let’s Talk Moshiach
Host: Gil Burgos
Guest: Aviad Cohen
Topic: Messianic Judaism Exposed

Is Messianic Judaism is a gateway to Orthodox Jewish Conversion? I, Aviad Cohen have spent the past few years picking up on these clues. I wish none of this was ever true, but it is. As a former Pharisee of 29 years and now a believer in Yeshua Messiah, it bewilders me to see how people are foresaking the Scriptures and turning to Talmudism and other witchcraft practices (Kabbalah candle lightings, wearing a “hex”agram which is also used in Fremasonry and other occult organizations, Talmudic Kippah wearing and milk/meat Talmudic laws and much more. Some people are being mislead by publications and organizations to never use the name Yahweh again and to call Him HaShem. That is outragious!

Even worse, it’s Pharisaic. Gentiles are supposed to follow the Noahide Laws?
NO! Why are these wolves in sheeps clothing pushing Messianic Gentiles to abandon their faith, take on the Noahide Laws in order to become “more Jewish” and accepted by Messianic Pharisaic Jews? Why do they call themselves rabbis, when we have one Rabbi, Yeshua Messiah (Matthew 23:8)?

Some people are listening to Pharisaic music online and then getting sucked in by the music and Jewish cult-ure and then convert to Orthodox Judaism. Beware of the Pharisaic pied pipers. You might have some of them in your CD collection.
This is an insightful interview. And as for this topic of discussion, it is NOT an isolated case. This is happening right now. People in Messianic Judaism (especially Gentiles) are currently “finding their Jewish blood”, are leaving Yeshua Messiah and then converting to Orthodox Judasim in the name of “connecting with their Jewishness.” They don’t want the Gospel. They want to speak yiddish and eat gefilte fish and enjoy a “warm Shabbos mean with chabbadnicks.”

Beyond that, many people in the Messianic Judasim movement do not have discernment and are projecting themselves in online social-networking websites
(MySpace/Facebook/Youtube) as “just Jewish” and you can’t tell the difference between them and a Jewish American Princess with a Jezebel harlotry spirit.
The same go for the Messianic “Ahabs.”

Even some top leaders in Messianic Judasim are aware of some of these peculiar situations that are occuring, which seems to have gotten a bit out of hand.
Can they address this and move the movement in the right direction away from Pharisaic Judaism and towards Yeshua Messiah and Torah? It might be too late.
Do they want to address any of this? No. It’s an avalanche of confusion and false doctrine, led by many wolves in sheeps clothing, and its tumbling straight down into hell. Either you grab hold of Yeshua Messiah and Yahweh’s Torah and hop out and into a healthy fellowship with sound doctrine or you will be caught in the “matzoh ball avalanche mess.”

WE NEED TO BE SET-APART! We are not supposed to be trying to fit in with unsaved Jewish people and take on Pharisaic practices. That is not evangelism. That is assimilation! Assimilating to the identity of those who are aligned with the same practices of the Scribes and Pharisees who sentenced Yeshua Messiah to death and murdered the prophets. Any form of Judaism is STILL JUDAISM.

Let’s pray that people will WAKE UP and seek Yeshua instead of seeking “their Judaism.” There is a reason that they call it their Judasim. Because it is a religion of man. They made it. They own it. As for the Truth, you just follow it or fall off the narrow path and into the wider path that leads to eternal destruction.

As for “Lashon Hara” that is from the oral traditions of man (Pharisees).
People in the movement told me to shut up about what I saw was really going on in the Todd Bentley false revival. They rebuked me and then emailed me a bit later to say they were sorry and that I was right. Some of you forget where I have come from. I know what all these forms of Judaism are and the road of destruction these sects lead people astray in. Funny, how the editor of Charisma called out everyone who was threatening and rebuking people who called out Todd Bentley’s ministry.
People were pushed to “not judge this move of God.” Now they realize they had no discernment. Again, if your heart is not in the right place, you follow man’s traditions, are involved in witchcraft – you will not have much discernment, if any at all. You will just feel puffed up. Match it up to the Scriptures. If someone starts justifying their traditions by certain things that are not in the Scriptures or if they are twisting Scripture to make it justify their Pharisaic traditions, you need to undertand the red flag there.



Thoughts???

Greek and English Prepositions, by comparison.

Now, despite the last post, I did not purpose a review of a text. Rather, my thoughts have been turned to the prepositions about which I have been reviewing today. Consider English, in which dozens of prepositions make their home. If you were to ask my Roman Catholic friends, Maryalice Ralston, and William Phillips, they could rattle off just about every English preposition in the English language, ALPHABETICALLY!!! They were forced to as good RC’s in an RC school. Thank the Lord for these nuns who demand obedience.
A list similar to the following (taken from wikipedia.org)
a (see “an” for usage in front of vowels.)
abaft
aboard
about
above
absent
across
afore
after
against
along
alongside
amid
amidst
among
amongst
an (see “a” for usage in front of consonants.)
apropos (“apropos of” is a common derived term.)
around
as
aside
astride
at
athwart
atop
barring
before
behind
below
beneath
beside
besides
between
betwixt
beyond
but
by
circa
concerning
despite
down
during
except
excluding
failing
following
for
from
given
in
including
inside
into
like
mid (from “amid”. Usually used poetically.)
midst (from “amidst”. Usually used poetically.)
minus
near
next
notwithstanding (also used post positionally)
of
off
on
onto
opposite
out
outside
over
pace
passim
past
per
plus
pro
qua
regarding
round
sans
save
since
than
through, thru (informal)
throughout, thruout (informal)
till
times
to
toward
towards
under
underneath
unlike
until
up
upon
versus, commonly abbreviated as “vs.”
via
vice, meaning “in place of”[1]
with
within
without
worth
Two words
according to
ahead of
as of
as per
as regards
aside from
because of
close to
due to
except for
far from
in to (contracted as into)
inside of (note that inside out is an adverb, not a preposition)
instead of
left of
near to
next to
on to (contracted as onto)
out from
out of
outside of
owing to
prior to
pursuant to
regardless of
right of
subsequent to
thanks to
that of
where as
[edit]
Three words
as far as
as well as
by means of
in accordance with
in addition to
in case of
in front of
in lieu of
in place of
in point of
in spite of
on account of
on behalf of
on top of
with regard to
with respect to
Archaic or infrequently used
anent
anti (loan word)
behither
betwixt
chez
cum (Latin loan word)
ere
fornenst
fornent
outwith
pro (loan word)
qua (loan word)
re (loan word)
sans (loan word)
‘twixt (from betwixt)
unto (largely supplanted by to; used in some formal, religious, or archaic contexts)
vis-à-vis (loan word)
Greek, on the other hand, at least, New Testament (Koine) Greek, has about 25 prepositions, given in the following list, which occur ten times or more in the Greek New Testament. I would love if you had anymore, if you could put them down as a comment beneath.
Easy by comparison to roughly 150 for English. Unfortunately, I have had to transliterate them, since blogger evidentally is not equipped to read Greek fonts. -ow means long -o sound as in low.
And when it says that certain prepositions occur with one case/two cases/three cases. That means Greek has cases like English.  Put simply: 
Genitive prepositions are connected to Genitive Case nouns, which is similar to the English possessive, 
Dative prepositions are connected to Dative Case nouns, which are function like English indirect objects.
Accusative prepositions are connected to Accusative Case nouns, which function like direct objects in English.
The case is determined in Greek, by the context of the noun to which the preposition is connected.  For example, if “meta” is connected to a Genitive noun, it will be translated as “with.” 
The preositions with one case, however, will usually only appear in the presence of the particular case with which they are associated.  For example, in order for “ana” to be present, there must be an Accusative noun present in the verse in question.  No Accusative noun, no Accusative preposition. The good thing about this is, if you see one of these one-case prepositions, that means you will run across a noun in that case, and it usually is the next word. 
One other thing, just because you do not have an Accusative/Genitive/Dative preposition, does not mean there will be no Accusative/Genitive/Dative preposition.  Accusative nouns to not need prepositions to exist.  Only prepositional phrases do.  
Prepositional phrases are those phrases that contain both a preposition (a word that describes position) and it’s object.  “Under the bridge” is a prepositional phrase, with “under” functioning as the preposition and “bridge” functioning as it’s object. 
Anyway, enough babbling, and onto the list.  
Prepositions with one case
ana
accusative: up, upwards
anti
instead of
apo
genitive: from, away from
achree, achrees
genitive: as far as, until
eis
accusative: to, into
ek, eks
genitive: from, out of
emprowsthen
genitive: before (place)
enowpion
genitive: before (place)
en
dative: in, with
eksow
genitive: outside, out of
eows
genitive: until, as far as
opeesow
genitive: behind
pro
genitive: before
pros
accusative: to, towards, with
soon
dative: with
chowrees
genitive: apart from
Prepositions
with two cases

deea
genitive: through
accusative: on account of
kata
genitive: down from, against
accusative: according to, throughout, during
meta
genitive: with
accusative: after
peree
genitive: concerning, about
accusative: around
huper
genitive: on behalf of, for
accusative: above
hupo
genitive: by
accusative: under
Prepositions
with three cases
para
accusative: alongside, beside
genitive: from beside
dative: (resting) beside
epee
genitive, accusative, dative: on, upon
If you have any thoughts on the following, please, I enjoy this subject, grammar and language, intensely. Drop a line and we will chat. Or just ask the students at Dayspring Christian School how much I enjoy this material.

Some thoughts on New Testament Greek, and a really good book for that subject

So, I was reviewing Joe Castleberry’s First-year Greek text (by “review” I mean refreshing myself in the principles, in preparation for Second Year Greek, not writing a book review), which is incidentally one of the best first-edition textbooks available for first year NT Greek, by virtue of the fact that he drives and pushes vocabulary to an insane degree.
If one takes a year of serious study with Dr. Castleberry’s text, then by the end of the year, you will have picked up all vocabulary occurring in the New Testament occurring ten times or more-most grammars get you to words occurring 50 times or more. The reason he pushes vocabulary as he does is because his book is an Independent Study Textbook through ICI/Global University, a correspondence university of the Assemblies of God. Most people who receive this text are overseas without ready access to a plethora of NT Greek study materials, so to have a single volume that introduces the subject of Greek study and then unloads copious amounts of vocab will readily stand head and shoulders above any who use texts without such an emphasis on vocabulary. More over, given Castleberry is a polyglot, primarily in Spanish, and an experienced Latin American missionary, he is capable of communicating linguistic concepts to people of other cultures easily.
Now, does that mean Greek with anyone is a walk in the park? No, for the majority of us, especially for the majority of us who make the leap to seminary study, Greek is one of those burdensome tasks with which we would rather avoid like the plague. Greek, like other language courses, is a hearty subject that requires daily interaction and concerted practice, even when one does not feel like it. It requires a mind for analysis. But for those of us who love the Scripture and believe in their inerrency, there are few things more worthwhile, especially with the biases potentially inherent in the numerous translations, than the study of the languages themselves.
Next Post: Prepositions…

Jewish Messiahs, Jesus, sacrifices, and Leviticus

I will be honest, I have been stuck in Leviticus for some time.  And, you know what, it’s really been a great eye-opener into the Scriptures.  Leviticus deals with everything relevant to the Levites, those descendants of Levi who shared the responsibility for the temple, and particularly those connected to Aaron and his lineage through Eleazar.  What has really blessed me in this reading is the casual friendship I have with one of my Facebook friends who is out in Chicago at their Divinity School, I presume, who happens to be Jewish.  He has spoken some things that were in part corrective to my understanding, and the understanding which is connected to our understanding as believers (note: I did not use the term Jew of Gentile there, because in Christ there is neither Jew nor Gentile, ultimately, except as we self-designate). 

If we fail to embrace the Torah as believers, then we forget our history and the purpose of our L-rd.  The offerings expound, to the letter, what Jesus did.  Jesus was not only the burnt offering, wholly self-offered to the Father, for the joy set before himself,  he was also the sin offering, scapegoat, freewill offering, tresspass offering, grain offering, guilt offering, and fellowship offering. Every verse between Leviticus 1:1 and 7:21, Jesus fulfilled, operated, and functioned on our behalf, and on behalf of the nation of Israel, making completely unnessecary any sacrificial system for the Jews.  I know you will probably reply, “yeah, Dave, but He fulfilled everything.”  Those of  whose response is this are missing the point, and there are six and a half chapters you need to ingest and commit to memory.  This is one of the most critical parts of all Scripture for the purpose that it shows the full weight of what Jesus did in fact fulfill as the Messiah.  Verse by verse, read it and let it sink in.  

Repeatedely it says, :”a male without defect,” “an offering made by fire,” “an aroma pleasing to the L-rd,” skin it, “cut it in pieces,” “wash out and offer the very heart and soul of this creature on the altar,” “no mutilated sacrifices,” “an offering of fellowship,” “roast the grain in the fire,” “take eat, and drink, this is my body,” “perfection in both animal and priest, and “no uncleanness in the camp.”

Wow.  If this does not get your blood pumping, that Jesus did all of this for us, and created all sorts of doors for us open to the Father, that were better than the covenant under Moses, though he spoke with G-d face to face as a man speaks to his friend, then something drasitcally needs to happen in your heart.  

Moreover, I enjoyed this comment from the desk of Gary Shapiro, my Jewish friend, who said the following on a reading of Leviticus 19.

I read Lev 19 as a rich and powerful articulation of what it means to bring God’s holiness into all corners of life. Underlying this articulation is the affirmation (19:2) that it is possible (and commanded) to possess the same holiness which is God’s holiness.

It is possible to possess the same holiness that G-d possess.   Does that not just blow you away?  That really gets into me every time I read it.  Leviticus 19:2.  We are commanded to be holy, and the reason we are commanded to be holy is because He is holy.  He does not give us an easy path or set of directions that, when followed, will imbue us with holiness.  Rather, the L-rd gives us the illustration of Him as G-d and his own character and behavior as a model for us to follow.  We are to follow the creator of the universe who has enabled us to be holy.  Note, He did not say, DO holy.  He said, BE holy.  It is to be who we are, not merely something we do.  

 What I fail to get concerning Judaism is that since He is the L-rd and does not change, yet the sacrificial system seems to not have changed, at least as to it’s requirements, where does that leave Judaism.  If they are commanded to offer these sacrifices, and they are not doing so, where does that leave them.  Jesus offered the sacrifice for them, and, at least, from the writings of the New Testament, claimed to be the Messiah of the Jewish people, and indeed of all people, and perfectly, once and for all, fulfilled the requirements of the entire sacrificial system, where does that leave Jews as Jews.  I would suggest that that leaves them in the perfect, albiet uncomfortable and offensive position of accepting Jesus for whom He claims to be and in fact is: the Messiah of the Jews and the perfect sacrifice for all sins.  If they accept Him, He will take care of, indeed has already taken care of the system, making it unnecessary.  The New Testament book of Hebrews makes this clear, and was written to bear witness to the Hebrews, the Jewish people, concerning the Messianic prophecies.  If this is the case, I would even push the envelope one level further and say, at the risk of offending some of my Jewish brethren that, except one receive the Jewish Messiah, one cannot be truly Jewish in ones heart, no matter the nationality, genealogy, the forms of worship, and the culture. 
  
That is, without Jesus, there is no real Judaism, since Judaism is marked by the sacrificial system, which he satisfied. 

No, this is not replacement theology.  This is Roman 11 speaking.  I have been grafted in, and the bible speaks of addition theology.  That is, that believers are grafted into Israel by faith, as Abraham was made righteous, or as we call it in Jewish terms of Leviticus 19, holy. 

Merry Xmas and Happy Holidays

On the way to church in Agawam, a brief 40 minutes from my home in central Connecticut, I was thinking about Bultmann’s program of demythologyzing the NT.  What got me thinking of this was all the irritating foolishness that flows forth from pulpits across America that masks the truth of the Scriptures with myths about our L-rd’s birth (with respects to my Jewish and non-Jewish brothers).  I got to thinking that we really need to demythologize Xmas and our notions of His birth.  

Here is what I mean.  We are told that Jesus was born to a carpenter, in winter, on December 25th.  We are told that he shivered in the cold, and that three wise men brought him gifts.  We are further told that his family was impoverished or poor, and it seems he was also rejected in the inn, for any number of reasons.  And finally, we are told that so say Xmas takes the Christ out of Christmas.

First of all I would like to say this.  Jesus was likely not born in winter, as Luke 2 spells this out (shepherds were in the fields keeping watch over their flocks by night).  That is, the weather would have been warm enough in order for shepherds to keep watch over their  flocks.  Other parts of the context, from weather.com such as 

Bethlehem has a Mediterranean climate, with hot and dry summers and cold winters. Winter temperatures (mid-December to mid-March) can be cold and rainy. January is the coldest month, with temperatures ranging from 1 to 13 degree Celsius (33–55 °F). From May through September, the weather is warm and sunny. August is the hottest month, with a high of 27 degrees Celsius (81 °F). Bethlehem receives an average of 700 millimeters (27.6 in) of rainfall annually, 70% between November and January.[60]

and other places in the Bible, might, while not accounting for the warmth of this Xmas, add to the  likelihood that the Son of G-d was born on December 25th.  

Thinking of the narrator who told us over the radio that he was born in the winter, gave me some pause.

It occurs that the crowds of people in Israel at the time of empire taxation might be accounted for by the occurrence of one of the biblical feasts, when the people had just gotten done with their harvesting, and resources were at their peak. 

Sukkot, anyone? If the Word was made flesh and tabernacled among us, according to John 1:14, perhaps we are looking at the taxation of barley harvest, and surely Caesar would wait until the vats were overflowing before he took his share, which would throw the people into even more frustration, that the emperor would dare impose a duty on a festival to their G-d. Perhaps we are looking at the context of the Feast of Tabernacles, which would place the birth of Jesus in the comfortable Autumn, and have implications for the rest of the culture, who spent their time during this week in homemade booths. 

Concerning the concept of Xmas, I cannot say it better than the lead pastor of James River A/G in Springfield. This is an extremely well-thought out explanation from the desk of John Lindell.  We really need to teach the languages of Scripture in many of our churches, otherwise we have ignorant myths spread about like the notion that Jesus was born in the winter, he was born on the 25th, or the foolishness of taking the “Christ” out of Christmas. Enjoy and feel free to leave your thoughts, which would help serve as a corrective of the thoughts here.

X-mas or Christmas

With Twitter and Facebook–saying as much as you can with an economy of words has become the new challenge. Especially during the Christmas season, with only 140 characters on Twitter, you have to keep it short and on many of my posts Christmas has been written as X-mas which has caused a bit of stir.
Some have thought me disrespectful or using slang. So whether people agree with using X-mas or not, perhaps a little background on its use will at least help people understand why at the very least X-mas is not slang, disrespectful or “taking Christ out of Christmas.” I am indebted to WikiAnswers for helping me provide a concise but detailed explanation.
Writing Xmas is not slang nor is it taking Christ out of the
season. In many respects, Greek is the language of Christianity–the New Testament was written in Greek and utilized the Greek alphabet. There are still traces of the Greek in symbols and phrases used today, like calling God ‘the alpha and the omega’ meaning ‘the beginning and the end’ because alpha is the first letter of the Greek alphabet and omega is the last. It’s like calling Him the A to Z!
Another place you might see Greek symbolism used in modern western Christianity is the Ichthys or fish symbol. You’ll have seen it somewhere, it’s the classic fish shape that people sometimes use to show they’re Christian. It’s called an Ichthys because that is Greek for fish. Why a fish as a symbol of Christianity? Because ‘Ichthys’ stands for Içsous Khristos Theou Huios, Sôtçr which means “Jesus Christ God’s Son, Savior.” The ‘ch’ in Ichthys stands for Christ, and the Greek symbol used to for ‘ch’ looks a lot like an ‘X.’
Similarly, the ‘Chi-Rho’ symbol that looks like an ‘X’ superimposed over a ‘P’ is actually the Greek letters Chi (X) and Rho (P) which are the first letters in Christ’s name. This symbol, like the fish, is almost as old as the Cross symbol and can be found scratched on the walls in the early Christian Church catacombs in Rome. The coincidence that the ‘X’ Chi letter also looks like a cross resulted in the ‘X’ being adopted as an abbreviation for “Christ.”
From ancient times, Christians have used the Greek letter that looks like an ‘X’ as an abbreviation of ‘Christ.’ Therefore, ‘Christians’ is abbreviated to ‘Xians,’ ‘Christ’ is abbreviated to ‘X’ and ‘Christmas’ is abbreviated to ‘Xmas.’ This is useful when people want a shorter way of writing something and is a reminder of Christianity’s roots.
The word ‘X-mas’ should never be pronounced ‘Ex-mass’ as the ‘X’ in it is not the letter ‘X’ in our alphabet. The letter is actually the Greek letter Chi “χ” (which looks like an ‘X’) which is the first letter of the Greek word ‘Christos’ meaning ‘Christ’.” Therefore ‘X-mas’ should be pronounced simply ‘Christmas’ because that is exactly what it is.
While you may not like the use of X-mas as an abbreviation for Christmas…the ‘X’ stands for Christ…it has since the earliest of times. Christ is the reason for the season… and for everything else.