2 Cor. 5:17

Text:

ωστε ει τις εν χριστω καινη κτισις τα αρχαια παρηλθεν ιδου γεγονεν καινα τα παντα


How I translated it:
Insomuch as anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation 
The old has passed away 
Behold, all has been created new.


Many of us in the church have read this in a translation that has said something along the lines of “Therefore, if any man is in Christ he is a new creation, the old has passed, and all things have been made new.”  


Not only does the person become new, reborn as those of us who are “born-again” say, but more than that.  We get so caught up, in the conservative church world, in being born again, that such words become trite after decades of use, and we just pass it off with an “amen” and no second thought.  However, the words require us to think through them again.  


We can be “in Christ” in varying degrees, to the extent that we actively trust Him.  Hopefully we choose to be completely “in Christ” and not in ourselves.  That may not happen every day, but we can choose day by day whether or not we will fully trust Him, and that means not trusting whatsoever in our own abilities.  And as we trust fully in Him, we become that new creation, and not only do we become a new creation, more happens.  For when we become a new creation, we recieve new eyes, new ears, new hands and feet, and new faculties, for then to us is opened up a set of senses by which we may perceive the world as the L-rd perceives the world, we may see others as the Son sees them, we may hear with the L-rd’s ears, and taste and smell as He does.  


Excuse the metaphor, but the metaphor is nevertheless effective for communicating the mystery of what happens to us when we become followers of Yeshua ha-Mashiach.  Not only do you become new, but your perception of reality changes and transforms.  Your mind transforms, your heart transforms, your desires and affections transform, as you yield yourself to Him.  


Permit Him to transform and redirect you, for in that you will never be the same.  You come apart from  the worldly influences of the darkness in this place. And your coming apart from the worldly influences is for the purpose of reconciling the world to Him.  


And coming apart from the worldly influences does not mean you sever all contact with your unbelieving friends, but rather it means the internal changes that occur in you result in external changes your unbelieving friends can see and as you hang around and the L-rd in you begins to work his changes in them, this then will result in the praise of His glory.  “Let your light so shine that they may see your good works and praise your Father who is in heaven.”







Moving…

So, the living room is mostly packed, and I have started looking at the master bedroom closet.  Oy vey.  Work tonight.  Reading now to relax.  Had a nice talk with Kresha about finances several days ago.  Enjooying the time I have to get ready to move. 


Mentors vs. bosses/leaders…

I got a nice piece of counsel from Joe Castleberry, as well as a good quote.

“Better to have one bad but tolerable boss than ten well-intentioned mentors.”

This points out a stark reality.  At least when you are with a boss you are actually engaging your chosen field, whereas with mentors, much becomes theoretical, without much practice.

Better to be corrected by someone when you are engaging a particular field than to be corrected by someone while not engaging the field.

Hmmm…

Why am I seeking for a mentorship, when the last two major experiences I had with mentors were complete and utter busts?  What is the purpose of this, and what is my motivation for mentorship?  Is Christ enough as a mentor, as a spiritual father?  Is the Holy Spirit enough as a mentor?

Mentoring, says Joe Castleberry, is inferior to submitting to leadership.  Mentoring may not be biblical, but submitting to leadership most certainly is.

Hmmm.  I am still stuck on something.  Mentoring does not require anything but it’s own formal abstraction.  Now, real ministry, of itself, is preferable, and building relationships and being under the authority of those who can help you along in ministry, and getting the one-on-one sharing of wisdom, which is my motive for seeking a mentoring relationship, is great.

I know what to do, now I need to procure a place that moves me towards my destiny that enables me to rub elbows with others who are farther along than I am.

Internet Fasting, Except for…

Putting up blogs to get out my thoughts which need an outlet.  Still more of a typist than a writer on paper with pen.  Today was Good Friday.  I just got home. Kresha is sick with nausea, diarrhea, the boys miss her, I went to church, agreeing to do something without telling Kresha, before she became sick.

Is it just me or is there a religious spirit that haunts this time of year?  Yuck.  Zwingli is right.  Ceremonials for their own sake get in the way of the life of the community of faith.  And we really screw up the Resurrection holidays with our garbage that professes to celebrate the season.  Living last suppers, contatas, vapid Sunday morning services that are designed to cater to the C and E crowd, in some vain attempt to attract them back to church, while remainig so busy this time of year, we forget to reach out ot them in reality, truth, sincerity, and honesty.  Why do we seem the most artificial during Christmas and Resurrection?  We use the same rote passages, the same standards of outreach, the same overdone messages, and the same cliches.

We really need to simplify around this time of year, divest ourselves of our Resurrection vestments (double breasted suits and spring dresses with matching heels and hose) and we really need to trade in the pomp for sincerity, and WAY MORE community.

Yuck…

Church, divest yourselves of the ceremony and come back to the cardial circumcision.

Eugene Peterson, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Nexus of Discipleship

I am a person who loves the Scriptures, especially in the original languages.  I love to research the text, and learn what is said in the tongues of the writers themselves.  Four feet of my bookshelves are filled with books on Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Coptic, Akkadian, Syriac, Latin, and German books.  God gave me this aptitude for language.


I know the church can use someone like me.  I have no doubts of that.  I remained concerned as to what my place is in the church, since I do not know if they can handle me as a pastor.  


Several years, I attended a small group meeting led by some very good friends of ours.  One night, our small group was praying for Kresha and I, and someone spoke a word over me.  They said, you are a “professor to the people.”  This confirmed something the Lord specifically spoke to me about, in my calling to flow as a teacher to the body of Christ.  I love the church.  My heart is for the church.  My heart for the church is to see it deepen so it can bear the weight of what the Lord will set on her foundations.  My favorite group of believers to deal with is that category labeled the “doctors of the church.”  When I hear someone mention the “doctors of the church,” I think of people who many years from now, the church will look back on and say, this man or woman saved us a lot of trouble by teaching us this or that dynamic by the power of the Holy Spirit.  


I want to be that kind of man, like Gary McGee, who finished strong, taught the church much about her history, treated we his charges with the irenic dynamic utterly missing from so many scholars, and fought the battle with cancer in such a way that make many of us who don’t have cancer wish we lived our healthy lives the way he lived a life in illness.  


I want to be that kind of man, like David Falls, who endured the trials of malignment and slander as did David to Saul, and, after 10 years was vindicated by none except God Himself.


If such a calling, as “professor to the people,” places me in the context of a pastorate for the rest of my life, I want to attack that calling with the vigor Isaiah prophesied concerning those who waited on the Lord, and help my flock know the word of truth.  I want that congregation to shine like stars and hold out the word of life, in the midst of a dark world.  


If such a calling, as “professor to the people” places me with the chance at a post in a university, raising up the next generation of scholars, then I want to study to show myself approved, that my students shine like stars in the dark halls of that university.


Deitrich Bonhoeffer tells us about the difference between cheap grace and costly grace, and the call to discipleship.  I want to walk in my calling living according to the principle of costly grace, and I want to know that at the end of my life I did what I was called to do, like Eugene Peterson.  Between these two men of God, we gain a full understanding of what is means to handle the weight of discipleship, by which we make disciples, and men and women of God, who are able to handle the weight of the integrity for which the world will curse us like Job’s wife.  Are you ready for that weight?  It’s inconvenient all the time, and requires us to live in a state of normal that the world will find quite irritating.


For I live only to see Your face
So shine on me…




Did Someone Say LENT?

The following is from the desk of Jennifer Page.  I am with her.  This is one time of year I really enjoy for three reasons.  


1) I am joining many millions of believers in actual intercession, seeking to be more like Him and conformed to His death, that of our Lord.


2) Despite my obvious Pentecostal leanings, I remember what my Methodist pastor, Richard Nussel once told me. “Don’t forget where you come from.”  Unlike most Pentecostals I have encountered who came out of high-church traditions with the testimony they were delivered from that bondage, I actually hold my 14 Methodist years as a precious gift from God, during which my mother and the church of which I was part protected me from our hometown’s fundamentalists and evangelicals who balked at my understanding of salvation and relationship with Christ.  To this day, every time this year comes around, I remember to pray specifically for the movement of the Holy Spirit within the UMC, desiring the Lord break through and out amongst the membership.  I pray for the fruition of a dream I was given years ago in Nashville.  


3) I still affirm Wesley as the preeminent theologian of the last 500 years, who himself fasted Wednesdays and Fridays, and mandated the same practice on anyone upon whom he laid hands.  This is the reason so many modern day believers do not flow the way they should flow (independence from relying on the Holy Spirit).  They forget the part of the text that says, “WHEN you fast.” 


And so, without further adeiu:


From the desk of Jennifer Page


I’m actually the wierdo that LIKES this time of year when Christians all over the world enter a season of fasting and prayer together called Lent. (By the way, it starts TOMORROW! Are YOU ready…?)
Most often, those of us who participate in Lent will decide to give up something for the season, like chocolate. Most people I know like to grumble about this practice, and even fewer people I know actually do it, but I like to challenge myself to make each year harder than the one before. Over time, it grew to encompass more than just my diet.
  
For example, last year I gave up, among other things, sleeping in a bed, hot water for bathing, and changed my diet. Already accustomed to eating just one meal a day most of the time, I allowed myself to eat whatever I wanted for those meals only on Sundays and Wednesdays when I was going to be around my family or at church. The other five days out of the week, (when you weren’t looking), I could only have soup and bread once a day, and whatever I wanted to drink that wasn’t carbonated.
BUT I WORKED IN A DINER.
It wasn’t the uncomfortable rest sans bed or the freezing water for bathing that was hard. It was the work of going about my daily life, just another ordinary church-going neighborhood gal.
I got to see food, smell food, carry food, watch OTHER people EAT food, *and* clean up after them…all day long, five to seven days a week, (but never on Sunday mornings or Wednesday nights).
And if you wouldn’t mind tipping me, by the grace of GOD, I might be able to pay the bills this week. Thanks.
P.S. Don’t forget to smile.
…all Lent long. …and still keep up with daily study of the Scriptures and the regular office hours for prayer. (YOU try it, score a 10 on the nice scale, and thEn come talk to me.)
It was hard.
But that’s what I say on the other side of it now. Just like the year before that and the year before that. But going into Lent is always the same, too, even though what I do is different each year. Because I like to make it harder than it was the year before.
So every year there is always the same tension with GOD even though no two seasons of Lent have ever been the same from one year to the next. It usually goes something like this:
“NO-O-O…! I can’t…!” I yell at HIM honestly, tears streaming down my face. “How can YOU even ask me to do that?! That’s too hard! I CAN’T DO IT!!!” And I throw a two-year-old tantrum in the privacy of my living room alone with HIM.
“Exactly,” HE says to me.
FREEZE !!!
HOLD IT RIGHT THERE !!!
You want to know what Lent is about? What does it mean? Why would you ever do you do that to yourself?
That’s it right there.
“NO-O-O…! I can’t…!How can YOU even ask me to do that?! That’s too hard! I CAN’T DO IT!!!”
“Exactly.”
That’s Lent.

Well put, sister Page.








Confessions…

I would like to confess the following, in no particular order…
1. I miss Missouri and the worship we enjoyed there, with letting our kids dance and with us being able to wave flags and dance during worship.
2.  I am a little nervous about my application to Yale, but I am very happy that I chose to apply.
3.  I have been praying for many of my students at Dayspring Xian School.  That the Lord would raise them up.  Luke; Cassie; Hannah; Zach; Batman and Robin; Christina, Rebecca, and Kim; Jessy; Chala; Renee; Jamie; Karen; Destiny; Caleb; Josh and Carmel; Robbie; Benyamani; Twinkles; and others.  You guys have been foremost on my heart and in my prayers, and I wish for the Lord to release each of you into the fullness of your destinies.  To a certain extent, I claim responsibility for each of your callings, and I take a vested interest in where He is taking you.  
4. I really have been enjoying the teaching of Mike Bickle and the worship of Misty Edwards since coming north and east.  New England has been a good place for me to pray and intercede a ton.
5. Especially since my season of spiritual abuse ended nearly half a decade ago, I have really seen the need for the church to have vibrant leaders who protect her flocks.  God has grown my heart for discipleship by exponents.  
6. Despite the accusations of Latter Rain connections, Mike Bickle, Todd Ganovski, and Misty Edwards have been used of the Lord to minister many copious amounts of encouragement.
7. Kresha, Isaac, and Emmaus.  The three of you have been God’s instruments of further and most important solace in this hard, cold, barren place.  This is by far the most difficult season we have encountered, and true to the old adage, “the grass is never greener.”  That is, except when the Lord moves and calls.  I pray He uses me to communicate the same breadth and depth of sanity to your lives, that He has used you to communicate to me.  I listed you guys with #7 as you are the symbol of completion in the one aspect of my life by which God has helped to move in other areas of my life.  You are my Christ-bearance, laughter, and hot springs. 
7b. David and Wendy Falls: Words do not begin to communicate, oh quiet ministers of grace in Ohio, what God has used y’all and Kresha to speak to me.  Stay strong, and faithful.  He has a task for you.  Complete it.  Thank you three for encouraging me along with countless others, to apply to Yale, and long with my family, despite the concerns of others that going to such a liberal school would destroy my faith.  Thank you, David and Wendy, for WALKING with us, with my family through heartache, joy, solitude, and congregation.  You guys are at the top of my list for ministerial associations.  Though you may get blasted by others in the ministry, and because you, as well as my wife, defended, protected, and did not try to rewire me to function a certain way in the kingdom, since you three  know how I was wired (strange though it seems to many) in the manner of a seer and teacher.  May I learn the sacrifice required to flow where God has called me to flow.
8. Dr. Railey’s definition of the attribute of God’s love as “that quality of God by which He is eternally moved to self-communication” has helped remind me that He really does still speak to us, use us, and move through, in, and for us at all times. 
9. To the Lord, you have given me life and light.  May I do Your word and handling of Your word justice, as I seek to dissert the texts you will give me.  I appreciate the chance at having the opportunity to delve into your words, and help others to delve therein.  Help your servant to suck out the marrow and teach others to do the same.  
My many thanks to the many members of the household of faith who have been used to flesh out Christ’s unfailing love to me.  

Text of Letter from AG Holder on the DOMA

WASHINGTON – The Attorney General made the following statement today about the Department’s course of action in two lawsuits, Pedersen v. OPM and Windsor v. United States, challenging Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage for federal purposes as only between a man and a woman:
In the two years since this Administration took office, the Department of Justice has defended Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act on several occasions in federal court.   Each of those cases evaluating Section 3 was considered in jurisdictions in which binding circuit court precedents hold that laws singling out people based on sexual orientation, as DOMA does, are constitutional if there is a rational basis for their enactment.   While the President opposes DOMA and believes it should be repealed, the Department has defended it in court because we were able to advance reasonable arguments under that rational basis standard.  
Section 3 of DOMA has now been challenged in the Second Circuit, however, which has no established or binding standard for how laws concerning sexual orientation should be treated.  In these cases, the Administration faces for the first time the question of whether laws regarding sexual orientation are subject to the more permissive standard of review or whether a more rigorous standard, under which laws targeting minority groups with a history of discrimination are viewed with suspicion by the courts, should apply.
After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation, the President has concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny.   The President has also concluded that Section 3 of DOMA, as applied to legally married same-sex couples, fails to meet that standard and is therefore unconstitutional.   Given that conclusion, the President has instructed the Department not to defend the statute in such cases.   I fully concur with the President’s determination.
Consequently, the Department will not defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA as applied to same-sex married couples in the two cases filed in the Second Circuit.   We will, however, remain parties to the cases and continue to represent the interests of the United States throughout the litigation.   I have informed Members of Congress of this decision, so Members who wish to defend the statute may pursue that option.   The Department will also work closely with the courts to ensure that Congress has a full and fair opportunity to participate in pending litigation.  
Furthermore, pursuant to the President ’ s instructions, and upon further notification to Congress, I will instruct Department attorneys to advise courts in other pending DOMA litigation of the President’s and my conclusions that a heightened standard should apply, that Section 3 is unconstitutional under that standard and that the Department will cease defense of Section 3. 
The Department has a longstanding practice of defending the constitutionality of duly-enacted statutes if reasonable arguments can be made in their defense.   At the same time, the Department in the past has declined to defend statutes despite the availability of professionally responsible arguments, in part because – as here – the Department does not consider every such argument to be a “reasonable” one.   Moreover, the Department has declined to defend a statute in cases, like this one, where the President has concluded that the statute is unconstitutional.  
Much of the legal landscape has changed in the 15 years since Congress passed DOMA.   The Supreme Court has ruled that laws criminalizing homosexual conduct are unconstitutional.  Congress has repealed the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.   Several lower courts have ruled DOMA itself to be unconstitutional.   Section 3 of DOMA will continue to remain in effect unless Congress repeals it or there is a final judicial finding that strikes it down, and the President has informed me that the Executive Branch will continue to enforce the law.   But while both the wisdom and the legality of Section 3 of DOMA will continue to be the subject of both extensive litigation and public debate, this Administration will no longer assert its constitutionality in court.

DOMA, Executive Branch Responsibilities, and Executive Inactivism

The post of the day goes to Dave Heughins.  Concerning the President’s take on Dum-er, DOMA.  Heh. Post from what he sent me


The week I decided to talk about Biblical marriage is the week the President decided to abandon it.  So he can pick and choose which laws he upholds?  Does the policeman or the judge get to choose which laws they enforce?  Maybe that red light is in the wrong place?
None of us are surprised, I think.  With defense such as Holder was giving for Doma, who needs plaintiffs?  The government that’s in my face about buying health insurance and energy saving light bulbs has no logical interest in where babies come from or who raises them?  As in future voters, tax payers, citizens – or not?  They don’t know where a healthy society comes from either – and I don’t mean bottled water!  I should say Obama’s conscience should be conflicted.  When you know what is right and do what is wrong – to be popular with the in-crowd – what does that make you? 



The Executive Branch’s responsibility, according to a basic understanding of the definition of the term “executive” is to execute (enforce) the law.  


Teddy Roosevelt could have chosen to ignore blue laws in NY State when Governor, or the cops could ignore traffic laws, or other executives could choose to ignore their Constitutions’ several clauses, to the detriment of two things 1) respect for their various constitutions 2) respect for the execution of their offices, which are empowered by those constitutions.  But they did not.  They executed and execute laws which were or are on the books and unpopular with criminals (speeding laws, blue laws, murder laws, theft laws, pornography laws), despite their personal feelings or “professional assessments,” because those are the laws of the land.  For us to set the precedent that a law does not need to be executed is to shirk office.


Also, in plain, unbastardized English, and without need for some “living, breathing” exegesis or interpretation (as only the Word of God is living and breathing), Article 2, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution requires the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”  It does not say that the President shall “take care to determine the constitutionality of the Laws,” or “take care to interpret and apply the Laws.” Interpretation of the constitutionality of a given law rests with the Judicial Branch, who judges the law against other laws and against the Constitution.